Barr
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
weissleburg
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Trump
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's cellmate
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00019913.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted email thread from January 5, 2021, between US Attorney's Office (USANYS) employees. The subject of the email is a link to a NY Daily News article reporting that former Attorney General Bill Barr questioned Jeffrey Epstein's cellmate. The email appears to be an internal circulation of press coverage regarding the Epstein case.
EFTA00018735.pdf
Internal email correspondence within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated May 6, 2020. Staff members are circulating news articles from the New York Law Journal ('The Prince and the Proffer') and NY Daily News regarding Judge Berman's critical comments on DOJ policies and investigations 'post-Epstein'.
DOJ-OGR-00022611.tif
This document is an index or keyword list, likely from a deposition transcript or similar legal document, indicated by the 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES' branding and the page:line number format. It lists various words alphabetically, followed by numerical references, which typically denote page and line numbers where those words appear in a larger text. The document includes common words, proper nouns like 'Ayotte', 'Barak', 'Barr', 'Barclays', 'Barings', and locations such as 'Bahamas', 'Australia', and 'Beach'.
DOJ-OGR-00015048.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 789) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 22, 2025. It outlines the legal standards and 'special circumstances' under which grand jury records may be released, citing precedents like *In re Craig* and *Laws. 'Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. v. Garland*. The text lists specific factors a district court must weigh when considering disclosure, such as the status of principals, privacy of families, and whether witnesses are still alive.
DOJ-OGR-00020962.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis regarding a challenge to the credibility of a juror, identified as Juror 50. The defendant, Maxwell, argued the juror's testimony was "self-serving" and "rehearsed," and that his explanation for an incorrect answer on a questionnaire was not plausible. The Court rejects these arguments, finding the juror's preparation for testimony to be reasonable and his explanation for the questionnaire error credible, ultimately expressing satisfaction with his answers.
DOJ-OGR-00022053.jpg
This document, a printout of a news article dated March 31, 2020, discusses the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in the Manhattan Correctional Center, including a DOJ investigation. It details the unsealing of court records from a lawsuit by accuser Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, which contained allegations against several high-profile individuals. The article also revisits the controversial 2008 'sweetheart' plea deal Epstein received from former U.S. attorney Alex Acosta in Florida.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027753.jpg
This document is a log of text messages exchanged on May 27, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses geopolitical strategies involving China and India, as well as navigating US political and legal figures including Biden, Horowitz, and Barr, alongside references to Deutsche Bank (DB) and New York State (NYS). The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027719.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction log of digital messages from May 22, 2019. It records a conversation involving an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation touches on political topics, specifically referencing an Inspector General report and Attorney General William Barr targeting intelligence chiefs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027657.jpg
This document contains a log of digital messages from April 30, 2019, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation appears to discuss legal risks, mentioning 'Barr' (likely AG William Barr) and 'Weiseblburg' (likely Allen Weisselberg) in the context of material witnesses and New York jurisdiction. Epstein also mentions a meeting in Vienna and characterizes a case against him or associates as 'weak' and 'not well done.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027656.jpg
This document contains a log of digital messages from April 30, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses a legal strategy to 'drag this out for 15 months,' mentions 'weissleburg' (likely Allen Weisselberg) requiring federal immunity which 'barr' (likely William Barr) is unlikely to authorize, and identifies 'nystate' as the key to the situation. The document bears a House Oversight Committee footer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027562.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction log of text messages from December 7, 2018. The redacted sender discusses political events, specifically criticizing 'Barr' (likely William Barr) as a 'disaster,' commenting on 'Tillerson' (likely Rex Tillerson), and mentioning French politician Jacques Lang. The sender also refers to a 'French throwdown tomorrow,' likely referencing the Yellow Vest protests active in France at that time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026942.jpg
An email sent on April 18, 2019, from Jonathan Farkas to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' (an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The message asserts that 'Barr' (likely Attorney General William Barr) would protect 'Trump', claiming a 50-year acquaintance. The date coincides with the public release of the redacted Mueller Report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity