American Bar Association (ABA)
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00015225.tif
This document is a list of academic publications by E.F. Loftus and various co-authors from 1986 to 1988, primarily focusing on topics in psychology, memory, eyewitness testimony, and forensic psychology. It details journal articles, book chapters, and a supplement to a law book, showcasing extensive research output in these fields during that period.
DOJ-OGR-00023169.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal report, specifically discussing Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) 4-8.4, which addresses conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, including dishonesty, fraud, and misrepresentation. It cites two Florida Bar cases, Frederick (2000) and Shankman (2010), to illustrate how these rules apply, particularly noting that an attorney's actions leading to delayed case resolution and increased client costs can violate FRPC 4-8.4(d). The document also references OPR's examination of FRPC 4-3.8 and the non-binding nature of American Bar Association (ABA) standards for prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00021331.jpg
This document appears to be page 131 of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, filed as an exhibit in court. It analyzes Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) 4-8.4 regarding attorney misconduct, specifically dishonesty and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. A footnote clarifies that while OPR examined FRPC 4-3.8 and ABA standards, OPR does not consider ABA standards binding on Department of Justice prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00009459.jpg
This document is a page from the Curriculum Vitae of legal ethics professor Stephen Gillers, listed as 'Page 13 of 29' in a 2012 court filing and 'Page 40 of 117' in a 2022 filing. It lists his academic publications and articles ranging from 1999 to 2011, focusing on legal ethics, settlement agreements, and attorney conduct. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, indicating it was processed by the Department of Justice Office of Government Relations.
DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of 29 from a court filing, discusses a lawyer's ethical obligations under various New York Rules of Professional Conduct. It emphasizes that a lawyer's duty to take remedial action, such as disclosing fraudulent conduct to a court, is triggered only by "actual knowledge," a subjective standard. The document cites the 1988 Second Circuit case 'Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee' to support the argument that a mere belief of wrongdoing is insufficient to compel disclosure.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity