law enforcement officers

Person
Mentions
16
Relationships
1
Events
7
Documents
8

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Investigative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Search warrant execution and evidence collection at a residence. Interior Office/Desk Area View
N/A Trial Evidence was presented at a trial, including testimony from four women, former employees, and law... N/A View
N/A Trial The legal proceeding for which the juror is being selected. The juror is instructed not to discus... courtroom View
N/A Trial The legal proceeding for which the juror is being considered. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Searches conducted by law enforcement officers to recover evidence Unspecified View
2021-12-18 N/A Searches conducted by law enforcement officers where evidence was seized Unspecified View
0006-07-01 N/A Search of New York Residence (Manhattan mansion) by law enforcement pursuant to warrants. Manhattan mansion, New York View

DOJ-OGR-00008612.jpg

This document is Page 74 of a court filing (Jury Instruction No. 52) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. The judge instructs the jury that evidence seized by law enforcement was obtained lawfully and properly admitted. The jury is directed to disregard any personal opinions about the search methods and to give the evidence full consideration in determining the defendant's guilt.

Court filing / jury instruction
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022126.jpg

This document is page 2 of a court order filed on May 25, 2021, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. It outlines the U.S. Government's ongoing and affirmative obligations to disclose information to the defense, including procedures for handling sensitive information related to national security or witness safety. The order also specifies the range of sanctions the Court can impose for non-compliance, from granting a continuance to dismissing charges entirely.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021968.jpg

This document is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a judge's ruling on the conditions for pretrial release for two codefendants. The judge imposes several conditions, including the surrender of all personal and duty firearms and permits, the posting of a $100,000 bond, the surrender of all travel documents, and a strict no-contact order between the defendants unless in the presence of their counsel.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009076.jpg

This document is page 9 of a juror questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. Juror ID 50 indicates they have no feelings or opinions about evidence from law enforcement searches or the use of expert witnesses that would affect their impartiality. The juror also affirms their willingness and ability to follow the court's instruction to avoid all media and any discussion of the case outside the courtroom until their jury service is complete.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009767.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror 50 in case 2:20-cr-00030-ABN, filed on March 24, 2022. The juror indicates they have no feelings or opinions about law enforcement searches or expert witnesses that would affect their impartiality. The juror also affirms they have no reservations about their ability to follow strict instructions to avoid all media and not discuss the case outside the courtroom.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005287.jpg

This document is page 11 of 40 from a jury questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page contains questions 15, 16, and 17 (renumbered from 14, 15, and 16) asking prospective jurors about their biases regarding law enforcement searches/evidence, their experience with expert witnesses, and their ability to adhere to strict media blackout instructions during the trial. The document includes handwritten edits renumbering the questions.

Court filing - jury questionnaire (page 11 of 40)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008778.jpg

This document is page 72 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It contains Jury Instruction No. 52, titled 'Use of Evidence from Searches,' where the judge instructs the jury that evidence seized by law enforcement was properly admitted and lawful. The jury is directed to disregard any personal opinions regarding the search methods and to give the evidence full consideration in determining the Defendant's guilt.

Court document (jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
1
Total
1

Psychiatric treatment report

From: Epstein's psychologist
To: law enforcement officers

Report submitted to satisfy probation requirements.

Report
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity