| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-09 | N/A | Discovery Production Deadline | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-21 | Vendor request | The Government requested its outside vendor to image, bates stamp, and download all responsive do... | N/A | View |
This document is Page 2 of a Government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on October 30, 2020. It addresses delays in electronic discovery production due to vendor volume and refutes defense accusations regarding the definition of the 'Prosecution Team' and the withholding of exculpatory material. A significant footnote (Footnote 2) argues that the 'genesis' of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Southern District of Florida is irrelevant because the current defendant (Maxwell) was not a party to it, was not named in it, and the agreement covered a different time period.
The outside vendor informed the Government that it would not finish bates stamping and loading responsive documents onto a hard drive until November 19, 2020, thus missing the November 9 deadline.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity