Norman Mailer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Claus Von Bulow
|
Social |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Henry Abbot
|
Advocate supporter |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Dinner party hosted by Claus Von Bulow and his girlfriend. | Unspecified | View |
| 1980-05-11 | Publication | Publication of the article “An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy” by Norman Mailer in t... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg
This legal document, part of the criminal case against Maxwell, argues that the government's prosecution is based on tainted evidence. The defense claims the government made false representations to circumvent a civil Protective Order from the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation case, and therefore the perjury charges stemming from Maxwell's depositions in that case should be suppressed. The document provides factual background on the civil case, where Virginia Giuffre alleged Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were involved in a scheme to sexually abuse and traffic her.
DOJ-OGR-00002354(3).jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Motion to Suppress) from February 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government made untrue representations regarding a redacted source who was instrumental in the prosecution and provided information before the investigation began. The text asserts that Maxwell would not have agreed to civil depositions in the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case without the Protective Order, and argues the court should suppress the fruits of the government's misrepresentation, specifically the perjury counts arising from those depositions.
DOJ-OGR-00002354(1).jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing in the criminal case against Maxwell, argues that the government's prosecution is fundamentally flawed. The defense claims the government made untrue representations to circumvent a civil Protective Order from the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation case, and improperly used Maxwell's deposition transcripts from that case to bring perjury charges. The document requests that the Court suppress this evidence or grant a hearing to investigate the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002351.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a court filing (Document 134) in the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. It lists legal authorities and articles referenced in the main brief, including a New York Daily News article about federal prosecutors declining to pursue Epstein and Maxwell in 2016, and a New York Times piece by Norman Mailer. It also cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
DOJ-OGR-00002351(1).jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 134 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The page is a table of authorities, citing two newspaper articles, a federal rule of civil procedure, and a constitutional amendment. The articles reference a 1980 piece by Norman Mailer and a 2020 report that Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017479.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the role played by Ron Silver) dated April 2, 2012. It recounts anecdotes regarding Claus Von Bulow, including a dinner party where Norman Mailer expressed disappointment at Von Bulow's apparent innocence, and a later lunch where Von Bulow inadvertently admitted to watching the movie 'Reversal of Fortune' despite claiming otherwise.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017313.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of high-profile legal work) dated April 2, 2012. The text recounts three specific instances where the author declined legal representation: a team defending an entity involving the Arab League, Muammar Gaddafi (and his son), and a deposed African leader offering stolen gold. It details a specific incident where the author visited Jack Henry Abbot at Rikers Island at the request of Norman Mailer, only to be physically attacked by Abbot after asking if he was a 'snitch,' leading the author to refuse the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017098.jpg
This document appears to be page 11 of a manuscript or autobiographical statement by Alan Dershowitz (inferred by context), dated April 2, 2012, and bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text lists numerous high-profile individuals the author has advised, including Presidents and celebrities, as well as prominent figures he has debated. It details his involvement in legal cases, his media advocacy for Israel, and mentions that in 2010 he declined an offer from the Israeli Prime Minister to serve as Israel's Ambassador to the UN.
Representation of Jack Henry Abbot
Request to represent Abbot after he stabbed a waiter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity