Trove
Sign In Sign Up

D. Utah

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00020063.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.

Legal filing (table of authorities)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017745.jpg

This document is page 31 of a legal text (likely a law review article from 2005 BYU Law Review) discussing amendments to Federal Rule 32(c)(1)(B) regarding presentence investigation reports and restitution for victims. It analyzes the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) and the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), arguing that courts should receive restitution information even when restitution is discretionary ('permits') rather than just mandatory ('requires'). The document bears the name 'David Schoen' (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney) at the bottom and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to Congress.

Legal document / law review article excerpt (house oversight production)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017711.jpg

This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 76 of 78 in the specific file) analyzing changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 21, 32, and 60) regarding victims' rights and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee for not going far enough to ensure victims have a right to be heard during case transfer decisions and sentencing. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a legal file or submission related to the investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, specifically regarding victims' rights violations.

Legal analysis / law review article excerpt (utah law review)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search