MS. SANCHEZ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Questioner (Speaker Q)
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of a sworn statement. | An unspecified location, no... | View |
| 2007-12-11 | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Plea Negotiations | Unknown | View |
EFTA00014110.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to attorney Roy Black regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The letter alleges that Epstein's participation in a work release program constitutes a material breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement, which required incarceration without community control. The U.S. Attorney demands Epstein withdraw from the program and complete his eighteen-month term of imprisonment as agreed.
EFTA00013801.pdf
This document is a legal rebuttal from Kirkland & Ellis LLP regarding the government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues that the DOJ's review was not independent, alleges prosecutorial misconduct regarding victim notification and the selection of victim representatives (citing a conflict of interest involving an AUSA's boyfriend), and disputes the government's characterization of the sexual conduct. The document also details the defense's objections to the government's threat to terminate the agreement if Epstein did not comply with unilaterally modified terms by June 2, 2008.
EFTA00013538.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida), signed on behalf of Alexander Acosta, to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz. The letter aggressively rebuts Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically denying a conflict of interest regarding the potential appointment of Bert Ocariz and defending the office's handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and victim notifications. The author expresses surprise at the attacks given previous cooperation and asserts that the office made significant concessions to Epstein during negotiations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012274.jpg
This document is page 19 of a sworn statement transcript from Onsor & Associates. It captures the conclusion of the testimony, where the questioner confirms the witness was not coerced and told the truth. The statement, attended by Mr. Goldberger and Ms. Sanchez, concluded at 12:15 p.m.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012272.jpg
This document is page 17 of a deposition transcript where a witness describes her financial desperation as a motive for seeking a paid 'massage' from Mr. Epstein. She admits it was important to convince Epstein she was over 18 to get the job and details how she was paid $300, using it to cover a debt caused by her boyfriend. The witness also claims that other 'girls' working for Epstein were the primary drivers of recruitment and deception, encouraging others to lie to 'bring in the business'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012265.jpg
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript where an individual is questioned about their relationship with Mr. Epstein. The deponent confirms visiting Epstein's house on only one occasion and denies ever traveling with him or leaving the state to meet him, though they heard 'other girls did'. The deponent also denies receiving any email or text communications from a redacted female about sexual activity.
Modification of Agreement
Proposed modification to the DPA which the defense claims was never agreed to.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity