FBI Florida Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
FBI New York Office
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigative subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
PBPD
|
Investigative hand off |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Inter agency cooperation tension |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Investigation | The 'Florida Investigation' conducted by the FBI Florida Office. | District of Florida | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | FBI Florida Office and USAO-SDFL conducted a prior federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. | Florida | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | PBPD referred its investigation to the FBI Florida Office. | Florida | View |
EFTA00020322.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Laura Menninger, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing physical and electronic evidence. The discussion focuses on arranging a secure location (500 Pearl Street) for Maxwell and her team to review 'highly confidential' materials, including thousands of images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences, as well as physical evidence stored in an FBI warehouse. The defense raises concerns about access to laptops, the ability to compare physical and electronic evidence, and the specific handling of sensitive materials.
EFTA00017752.pdf
An internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated April 2, 2019. The sender discusses a request from FBI Florida to obtain consent from the Southern District of Florida (SDLF) to transfer grand jury materials from the original Epstein case to SDNY. The email debates whether a specific team member or the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) should coordinate this request.
EFTA00015823.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 16 evidence discs labeled as 'Epstein Encase Files.' The government identified these discs as containing a forensic image of a computer seized from Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2005. However, the government concluded that the original warrant authorized seizure but not the search of the computer's contents, and thus they lack the lawful authority to review the files or allow the defense to access them.
DOJ-OGR-00001792.jpg
This document is a status update to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the Government's discovery process in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by case number/context). It details the Prosecution Team's acquisition of investigative files from the Palm Beach State Attorney (PBSA), the FBI Florida Office (24 boxes), and the USAO-SDFL (28 boxes) related to the 2006-2010 Epstein investigations. It also notes that the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) has gathered internal emails regarding the handling of the prior Florida investigation, including those of a primary prosecutor referred to as 'Attorney-1'.
DOJ-OGR-00001791.jpg
This document is a filing by the Government in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (US v. Maxwell) detailing the status of obtaining files from the original Florida investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines that the Government has the full FBI Florida Office file, which includes PBPD materials, and has recently obtained 60 pages from the PBPD directly, identifying five pages for discovery production. It also notes that the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office (PBSA) handled the state prosecution where Epstein pled guilty to procuring an underage girl, and the Government is addressing the collection of files from that office.
DOJ-OGR-00002875.jpg
This legal document, dated March 29, 2021, is a filing from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It clarifies the role of the FBI New York Office in an investigation conducted by the FBI Florida Office, stating that the New York office provided only 'ancillary support' by interviewing four witnesses between 2007 and 2008. The document asserts that this assistance did not make the New York office part of the prosecution team and that such inter-office cooperation is common.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity