two professors
PersonMentions
2
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
1
Relationship Network
Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons.
Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count.
Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak).
Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.
DOJ-OGR-00000642.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an unidentified speaker critiques an article from the New York Law Journal. The speaker refutes the opinions of two professors who argued against holding a public hearing and allowing victims to speak in the Jeffrey Epstein case, calling their suggestions 'incredulous' and incorrect as a matter of law.
Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1
Transparency and procedure in a criminal case
From:
two professors
To:
New York Law Journal
The speaker describes an article from two professors who argue that it's an 'odd moment for transparency in a criminal case,' that a court would normally grant a prosecutor's request to dismiss an indictment without a hearing, and that a judge would not schedule a hearing or allow victims to speak.
Article
N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity