Skelos
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-01 | Legal decision | Decision in the case United States v. Skelos. | 2d Cir. | View |
EFTA00032650.pdf
An email chain from July and August 2021 regarding the hiring of Paulette Taylor (Taylor'd Trial Consulting) by the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) for the USA v. Maxwell trial. The correspondence approves the engagement for focus groups, juror questionnaires, and trial statement feedback. Specific discussions include a cost estimate of $8,000 per 100 questionnaires for grading and references to previous high-profile cases like Martha Stewart.
EFTA00032620.pdf
This document is an email chain from July and August 2021 detailing the hiring of Paulette Taylor (Taylor'd Trial Consulting) by the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) for the 'USA v. Maxwell' trial. The correspondence covers the approval process, necessary forms (USA47, SOW), and a budget proposal which cites a cost of $8,000 per 100 juror questionnaires. A focus group for the trial was proposed for October 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00003145.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated April 16, 2021. The Government argues that its proposed schedule for providing discovery materials (including Section 3500, Giglio, and Jencks Act information) to the defense is adequate and even exceeds the standard practice in the district for high-profile cases. The Government offers to produce non-testifying witness statements eight weeks before trial and testifying witness materials four weeks in advance, asserting this provides ample time for the defense to prepare.
DOJ-OGR-00002944.jpg
This document is page 10 (labeled 'ix') of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing dated April 16, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents beginning with 'S' through 'U', including citations for *United States v. Nader* (marked 'passim', meaning cited frequently) and various Second Circuit decisions. The footer indicates this document was processed by the DOJ Office of Government Relations.
DOJ-OGR-00005380.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 26, 2021. The Government accepts the Court's proposed remarks for jury selection but seeks clarification on when the specific names of prospective jurors will be revealed to the legal parties. The Government requests confirmation that juror names will be withheld from the parties until November 16, 2021, the start of oral voir dire, to maintain juror anonymity in open court.
DOJ-OGR-00002895.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 195) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 5, 2021. The Government is arguing that the Court should require notice for all Rule 17(c) subpoenas rather than allowing them to be issued *ex parte* (without notice), citing various legal precedents (Wey, Earls, Skelos, St. Lawrence, Boyle) to support the position that *ex parte* proceedings should only be permitted with a compelling reason. Footnotes clarify the Government's concern regarding financial institutions responding to broad subpoenas for impeachment purposes and state that this request does not apply to subpoenas returnable at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002892.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of a filing from April 5, 2021, discusses the legal standard for obtaining documents via a subpoena under Rule 17(c). It heavily references the precedent set in 'United States v. Nixon', emphasizing that a request for documents must be made in good faith, be specific, and not constitute a general 'fishing expedition'. The document argues that courts require a stringent showing that the requested materials are relevant, admissible, and specifically identified, rather than just potentially useful to a case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019846.jpg
This document appears to be an article or report excerpt (marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp) comparing the prosecutorial styles of Robert Morgenthau and Preet Bharara. It details Bharara's firing by President Trump in March 2017, his record of prosecuting NY politicians like Sheldon Silver and Dean Skelos, and critiques his focus on hedge fund insider trading over systemic Wall Street bank abuses. The text highlights the tension between political corruption investigations and executive power.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity