This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 6, 2009, against Plaintiff Jane Doe II. The defense argues that the federal case should be dismissed because a nearly identical state case was filed 10 months prior, and because the plaintiff is improperly applying a 2006 amendment to 18 U.S.C. ยง2255 retroactively to conduct alleged to have occurred between 2003 and 2005, thereby violating the Ex Post Facto clause. Additionally, the motion argues that the statute does not allow for multiplying damages per incident and that the plaintiff failed to allege the necessary interstate commerce elements required for federal jurisdiction.
This document is an October 2008 court order granting a motion to remand the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen' back to state court. The federal judge ruled that the plaintiff had valid state-law claims (civil conspiracy, etc.) against defendant Haley Robson, a Florida resident, meaning her inclusion in the lawsuit was not 'fraudulent joinder' intended solely to defeat federal diversity jurisdiction. The order details the plaintiff's allegations that Robson recruited her at age 14 from Loxahatchee, Kellen managed the encounter, and Epstein sexually abused her at his Palm Beach mansion.
This is an agreed court order from the Circuit Court in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated March 5, 2007, for the case of the State of Florida v. Jeffrey E. Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Sandra K. McSorley, continues (postpones) a case disposition hearing originally set for March 8, 2007. Based on an agreement between Epstein's attorney, Jack A. Goldberger, and the state's attorney, Lanna Belohlavek, the hearing is rescheduled for May 16, 2007.
This document is an agreed court order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dated May 11, 2007, in the case of the State of Florida v. Jeffrey E. Epstein. Signed by Judge Sandra K. McSorley, the order continues the case disposition, rescheduling it from May 16, 2007, to November 16, 2007. The continuance was granted based on an agreement between the prosecution, represented by Lanna Belohlavek, and the defense, represented by Jack A. Goldberger, due to the complicated nature of the case.
This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, on behalf of "Jane Doe No. 1" against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The motion alleges that Jane Doe was a victim of Epstein, having been lured to his Palm Beach home and sexually assaulted. It references a criminal indictment filed by the State of Florida against Epstein on July 19, 2006, and a separate civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe.
This document is a condensed transcript (Pages 1-4) of a videotaped deposition of Bradley J. Edwards, taken on March 23, 2010, in West Palm Beach, Florida. The case involves Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff against Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. Notable attendees included Jeffrey Epstein himself and his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity