| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Peggy Siegal
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peggy Siegal
|
Correspondents |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annette Tapert
|
Ex spouses |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peggy Siegal
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peggy Siegal
|
Professional journalistic |
1
|
1 |
In an email thread from April 2011, journalist Jesse Kornbluth contacts Peggy Siegal regarding an article he is writing for 'the Times' about Jeffrey Epstein's post-prison social life. Kornbluth specifically questions Siegal about her decision to maintain a public friendship with Epstein despite his crimes, referencing a 'Break Fast' event attended by powerful people. Siegal initially responds asking what the piece is about before receiving the specific questions.
An email thread from April 2011 forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com). The thread originates with writer Jesse Kornbluth emailing publicist Peggy Siegal about the lack of social 'shunning' of Jeffrey Epstein following his prison sentence, citing a Daily Beast article about Siegal organizing events for Epstein where children were present. In the forwarding message, Siegal disparages Kornbluth as an 'angry loser' to an unknown recipient (likely an associate of Epstein or Epstein himself) and asks if she should call him.
This document is an email chain from April 30, 2011, between journalist Jesse Kornbluth and publicist Peggy Siegal. Kornbluth is writing a piece for 'the Times' and confronts Siegal about her continued public support and friendship with Jeffrey Epstein following his release from prison in Florida. Kornbluth specifically questions why she helped organize a Yom Kippur 'Break Fast' at Epstein's home where children were present, asking what it would take for her to shun him.
An email chain from April 2011 involving Peggy Siegal, Jesse Kornbluth, and an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein ('jeevacation'). Jesse Kornbluth writes to Siegal about the concept of 'shaming and shunning' the rich and powerful, explicitly noting that Jeffrey Epstein has not been shunned despite his reputation. Siegal forwards this to the Epstein-associated account, disparaging Kornbluth as an 'angry loser,' and subsequently confirms she wants the message shown to 'JE' (Epstein).
Discusses social shunning of the rich, specifically mentioning Epstein and a Daily Beast article about him.
Lengthy email discussing social shaming/shunning of the rich, specifically mentioning Jeffrey Epstein as someone who has not been shunned.
Initial request for comment/interview for a piece in the Times.
Agrees to talk, asks what the piece is about.
Detailed follow-up quoting a Daily Beast article and asking specific questions about why she remains friends with Epstein despite his crimes.
Requesting 3 minutes of time for a piece in the Times, noting she is briefly in it.
Would love to talk to you. What is piece about?
Direct questions regarding why she maintained a friendship with Epstein post-prison/crimes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity