United Plant Guard Workers

Organization
Mentions
9
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
Plant

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026024.jpg

An email chain from November 28, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation') and Jean Huguen (of Alberto Pinto). Epstein requests a one-week delay for a trip, explicitly stating that 'trump related issues' are occupying his time. Huguen replies proposing to reschedule a visit to 'works from Plant' and a meeting to mid-December.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026428.jpg

This document is an email chain from November 28, 2016, in which Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) asks a contact, Jean Huguen, to delay a trip by one week, citing that "trump related issues" are occupying his time. Huguen replies with a counter-proposal for December 15-16, which involves a visit to a location or entity called "Plant." Epstein then forwards this entire exchange to his assistant, Lesley Groff.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026426.jpg

This document is an email chain from November 28, 2016, in which Jeffrey Epstein requests to delay a trip by one week, citing 'trump related issues occupying my time.' His correspondent, Jean Huguen, proposes a new schedule for the 15th and 16th (presumably of December), which involves visiting '2 works from Plant' and a meeting. Epstein replies with a simple 'yes', seemingly agreeing to the new dates.

Email
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022283.jpg

This document is an excerpt from the Federal Register detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) justification for a rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights. The Board refutes claims that the rule violates the First Amendment or Section 8(c) of the NLRA by arguing that the notice is government-provided information, not compelled employer speech, and does not restrict an employer's right to express their own noncoercive views.

Federal register publication
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity