| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
D/S Ballard
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bitcoin community
|
Ally |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Leaders of the Bitcoin movement
|
Professional investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN
|
Sender recipient |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ballard
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-11-01 | N/A | Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on Bitcoin. | Senate Committee | View |
| 2013-06-01 | N/A | Conference organized by ICMEC regarding children/exploitation. | Unknown | View |
| 2006-01-21 | N/A | Report filed for missing 15-year-old female juvenile. | Cherokee County | View |
| 2006-01-21 | N/A | Incident Report filed for missing juvenile. | Cherokee County | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Scientist of the Year Award presentation | Harvard University | View |
| 2002-11-15 | N/A | Package delivered to B. Allen. | Redacted Address | View |
| 2002-11-14 | N/A | Package pickup/dropoff for B. Allen. | From Zip 33461 to Redacted ... | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Legal case | The case of Allen v. State was decided. | Delaware | View |
A letter dated July 30, 2019, from mathematician Jonathan Farley to Jeffrey Epstein, who was then incarcerated at MCC New York. Farley offers to publicly defend Epstein and generate positive media coverage ('show the world you are not a pariah') in exchange for a $5 million donation to Morgan State University or funding for a position at Oxford University. The letter references previous communications between the two in 2017, including a Skype call involving a student.
This document is a handwritten 'Psych Observation Log' for Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate #76318-054) covering July 8, 2019, to July 10, 2019. It details his behavior in 15-minute intervals while under suicide/psych watch in Cell #4, recorded by various 'Inmate Companions.' The logs record his sleeping habits, pacing, meals, bathroom usage, and conversations regarding prison etiquette, 'arbitrage,' 'celebs he knows,' and his legal visits.
This document is a Psych Observation Log for Jeffrey Epstein (Reg# 76318-054) covering July 8, 2019, to July 10, 2019. It details his behavior, sleep patterns, meals, and conversations with assigned 'Inmate Companions' while on suicide watch/observation in Cell #4. The log records specific conversations where Epstein asks about prison life, discusses 'the escort business,' mentions celebrities he knows, and complains about prison food.
This document is a Psych Observation Log for Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate 76318-054) covering July 8-10, 2019, shortly before his death. The log details his daily activities including sleeping, pacing, meals (which he criticized), and extended legal visits. Notably, the logs record lengthy conversations with 'Inmate Companions' where Epstein received tutorials on prison etiquette and discussed topics ranging from arbitrage and the 'escort business' to celebrities he knew.
This document is a FedEx invoice dated October 27, 2003, billed to Jeffrey E. Epstein for a total of $594.99. It details various shipments made between October 14 and October 23, 2003. Key individuals involved include Ghislaine Maxwell (sending and receiving packages, specifically at the Peninsula Hotel), Larry Visoski (sending a package), and Henry Rosovsky (receiving a package). A significant entry involves a third-party shipment referencing Epstein's aircraft, tail number N908JE, sent between aviation service companies in Florida.
This document is a FedEx invoice dated December 16, 2002, detailing two shipments made on November 14, 2002, from Jeffrey Epstein's account. The first shipment was sent by Epstein to B. Allen (address redacted) costing $7.30. The second shipment was sent by Nicole Hesse (under Epstein's account) to 'Helen' at Villard House (457 Madison Ave, NY) costing $25.74. Both packages originated from Florida zip codes (33461 and 33480) despite the sender address listed as NY.
A draft incident report from the Cherokee County Sheriff's Office dated January 21, 2006. Officer Autumn Allen reports speaking with D/S Ballard regarding a missing 15-year-old female who failed to return home after a basketball game the previous night. The narrative mentions the juvenile left with a group of males and that an altercation occurred between those males and friends of the juvenile.
This document is an alphabetical index from a legal transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It lists keywords and their corresponding page and line numbers from the transcript, which was prepared by Southern District Reporters. The document was filed on March 22, 2012, as part of the court record.
This document is a single page from a court transcript index (concordance) for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.', dated February 15, 2012. It lists words alphabetically (from 'abide' to 'Allen') alongside their frequency of use and page:line citations within the transcript. While the header indicates a filing date of 08/24/22 (associated with case 1:20-cv-00380-PAE, likely related to Ghislaine Maxwell/Epstein civil litigation), the content itself is a standard legal index from the Daugerdas tax fraud trial, likely included in the production as an exhibit or related file.
This document, a page from a legal filing, discusses the legal precedent for dividing a judicial district for the purpose of jury selection. It centers on the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. Bahna, where a defendant's second trial was moved to a different courthouse that drew jurors from a smaller, less diverse geographic pool than the entire district. The Second Circuit upheld this practice, ruling that the fairness of a jury pool should be evaluated based on the specific division from which it is drawn, not the district as a whole, especially when the division is based on administrative feasibility.
This legal document, page 9 of a court filing dated March 24, 2021, details a court's analysis of a dispute between the defendant, Schulte, and the Government over the proper 'relevant community' for jury selection. The court sides with the Government, ruling that the appropriate jury pool is the White Plains master wheel, which draws from all counties in the Southern District, rather than just those that supply jurors to Manhattan where the trial is to be held. This decision is based on legal precedent and the statutory composition of the judicial district.
This document is a draft incident report supplement from the Cherokee County Sheriff's Office dated January 21, 2006. Officer Autumn Allen reports speaking with D/S Ballard regarding a missing 15-year-old female juvenile who failed to attend a basketball game and was last seen with a group of males involved in an altercation. The document is stamped with DOJ identifiers, suggesting it is part of a larger federal records release.
This legal document, page 6 of a court filing from October 29, 2021, argues against the government's use of the term "victim" to refer to accusers in a trial. It cites numerous legal precedents from various state and federal courts to support the position that such language is improper and prejudicial, especially when the commission of a crime is in dispute. The document concludes by emphasizing the special role of a prosecutor to act impartially and seek justice, rather than simply to secure a conviction.
This document is page 17 of a court order filed on March 24, 2021, in the case United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC). The text details the Court's rejection of the defendant's (Schulte) challenges regarding jury selection, specifically concerning the 'fair cross-section' requirement of the Sixth Amendment and an 'Equal Protection' challenge under the Fifth Amendment. The Court dismisses arguments regarding the underrepresentation of African American and Hispanic American jurors, citing a lack of discriminatory intent and noting that a technical glitch in the White Plains master wheel actually increased minority representation rather than diminishing it.
This document is page 14 of a court order filed on August 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). The text analyzes a Sixth Amendment challenge regarding jury underrepresentation, specifically examining the 'absolute disparity method' for African American and Hispanic American representation in the White Plains master jury wheel. The Court concludes that the statistical disparities (1.25% and 1.15%) are within tolerated legal limits based on Second Circuit precedents and that Schulte has failed to meet the necessary burden for his claim.
This document is page 7 of a legal order filed on March 22, 2021, in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). The text details the court's analysis of Schulte's 'fair cross-section challenge' regarding the exclusion of African American and Hispanic American jurors under the Jury Selection and Service Act (JSSA) and the Sixth Amendment. While the court acknowledges these demographics are 'distinctive groups,' it rules that Schulte failed to meet the second and third elements of the Duren test, resulting in the rejection of his challenge.
This document is page 4 of a legal filing dated March 26, 2021, likely relating to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timeline and context of jury selection in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It outlines the procedural mechanics of the 'Jury Plan,' detailing how master jury wheels are constructed from voter registration lists in specific NY counties (Manhattan, Bronx, Westchester, etc.) to ensure proportionate representation. A footnote clarifies qualification criteria for jurors, including English proficiency, citizenship, and exemptions for hardship or occupation.
This document appears to be a single page excerpt from a House Oversight investigation file (indicated by the Bates stamp). It contains a brief narrative or quote regarding an individual named 'Allen' who discusses shifting from a purely law enforcement perspective to listening to leaders of the Bitcoin movement, finding their arguments persuasive.
This document appears to be a news article or report excerpt contained within House Oversight files (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029966). It details a series of hearings and meetings in Washington involving federal regulators (FinCEN, DOJ, Secret Service) and Bitcoin advocates (Murck, Andresen). The text highlights how advocates successfully shifted the regulatory narrative from criminal concerns (Silk Road, money laundering) to the economic importance of innovation, gaining support from key figures like Jennifer Shasky Calvery and activist 'Allen'.
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, appears to be a news report or briefing regarding a 2013 Senate inquiry into Bitcoin regulation. It details testimony given by 'Allen' (likely Ernie Allen of the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children) and Jerry Brito to the Senate Homeland Security Committee, discussing the balance between regulating illicit use and fostering the digital economy. The text outlines the committee's research process, including interviews with experts and letters sent to federal agencies like the DHS and DOJ.
This document appears to be an article or op-ed included in a House Oversight production (likely related to the Trump administration). It critically analyzes the Trump administration's shift toward a friendlier relationship with Viktor Orban's Hungarian government, contrasting it with the Obama administration's approach. The text details specific meetings involving NSC officials (Fiona Hill, John Bolton) and Hungarian officials, questions the strategic value of this 'appeasement' given Hungary's ties to Russia, and expresses cautious hope for the new U.S. ambassador, David Cornstein.
This document analyzes the Trump administration's policy towards the Hungarian government, describing it as a radical departure that allows the Orban government to dismantle democratic institutions without U.S. intervention. It details specific instances of this, including the targeting of NGOs and universities, and highlights high-level meetings between U.S. and Hungarian officials. The document also explores potential Hungarian motivations for appeasement and the hopes of some Hungarians for a stronger U.S. stance on democratic values and anti-Semitism.
Notified by dispatch to give B-43 a call.
Discussed report of missing 15-year-old female.
Notification to call unit B-43.
Discussion regarding a missing juvenile report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity