OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Publication of OPR Report | Washington Post (published) | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Investigation | The Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility conducted an investigation into t... | N/A | View |
EFTA00037840.pdf
This document is an email dated September 14, 2019, from the former Chief of the Palm Beach Police Department (name redacted) to an FBI Special Agent (name redacted). The sender, writing from Global Security Advisors, states they have information 'germane' to the investigation of Epstein's coconspirators and requests a phone call to share details the FBI may not be aware of.
EFTA00022091.pdf
This Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addresses multiple pretrial motions filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies most of the motions, including those seeking dismissal based on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay, but grants the motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial.
EFTA00009229.pdf
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility with R. Alexander Acosta on October 18, 2019. The interview focuses on Acosta's tenure as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and his office's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the decision to enter into a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. The transcript details discussions regarding the intake of the case, the assessment of evidence and legal issues including the petite policy, management decisions, and interactions with defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000073.tif
This document discusses the scope and negotiation history of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein and the USAO-SDFL, examining whether it was intended to bind other districts like USAO-SDNY. It cites the United States Attorney's Manual regarding the approval process for agreements and notes that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division denied having a role in Epstein's NPA. The document also mentions that prosecution in Florida was deferred in favor of state prosecution, provided Epstein adhered to the agreement's conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00000063.tif
This document is a table of contents or index for a series of legal documents, including opinions, judgments, orders, and a non-prosecution agreement, spanning dates from 2007 to 2024. It references legal proceedings involving the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility.
DOJ-OGR-00021889.jpg
This legal document page discusses the jurisdictional limits of U.S. Attorneys' offices in the context of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It states that the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) was not notified of the NPA made by the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL), and that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division denied any involvement. The text argues, based on the Judiciary Act of 1789, that a U.S. Attorney's authority is confined to their specific district and does not bind other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00021806.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (dated Sept 17, 2024) discussing the legal validity and scope of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It argues that the USAO-SDNY was not notified of, nor did it approve, the NPA created by the USAO-SDFL, and cites the Judiciary Act of 1789 to argue that one US Attorney's actions in a specific district do not bind other districts or the nation. It also notes that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division confirmed to the Office of Professional Responsibility that she had no role in the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00021675.jpg
This legal document discusses a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein that included a provision protecting potential co-conspirators, though Maxwell was not named or a party to it. Subsequently, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) charged Maxwell. Her attempts to dismiss these charges based on the NPA were denied by the District Court, which concluded the NPA did not bind the USAO-SDNY.
DOJ-OGR-00021203.jpg
This document is an organizational chart for the U.S. Department of Justice, depicting its structure for the period of 2006-2008. It outlines the hierarchy of leadership, starting with the Attorney General, and shows the various divisions, bureaus, and offices that fall under the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General. The chart provides a comprehensive overview of the department's components and their reporting relationships during that time.
DOJ-OGR-00021175.jpg
This document is the cover page of a November 2020 report by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. The report details an investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's handling of the 2006-2008 federal criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, including its interactions with victims.
DOJ-OGR-00010450.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case) summarizing the timeline of the government's case against Jeffrey Epstein. It details the resurrection of the case by the SDNY following the lenient 2007 Florida plea deal, his arrest on July 6, 2019, and the aftermath of his death in BOP custody. The text criticizes the government's failure to keep Epstein alive for trial and mentions the 'urgency' to repair the DOJ's reputation, ending with a mention of four women named as co-conspirators.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031401.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article discussing the legal fallout and investigations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It details a DOJ investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the plea deal, initiated by members of Congress including Ben Sasse and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The article also mentions a letter to the New York Times from Epstein's legal team (including Kenneth Starr) defending the original deal, and an upcoming court hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents related to Epstein's crimes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031397.jpg
This document describes the controversy surrounding Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein case, noting that a 53-page indictment was shelved in favor of a lenient 2008 plea deal. It details a newly announced investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the matter and includes a statement from Senator Sasse emphasizing the need for justice for the victims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity