Elizabeth Holmes
PersonRelationship Network
EFTA00032942.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated February 13, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the Roger Stone sentencing, fraud cases involving Theranos and Air Charter Co., and investigations into university funding. A specific article highlights a defamation dispute between attorneys David Boies and Alan Dershowitz, centering on Boies' remarks regarding Dershowitz's alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00032549.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated January 14, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a lawsuit filed by Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig against The New York Times for defamation, claiming the paper falsely implied he defended taking donations from Jeffrey Epstein. Other stories include the Bridgegate Supreme Court case, the Harvey Weinstein trial, and various fraud and corruption cases.
EFTA00022041.pdf
This document is a printout of a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter dated October 14, 2020. It highlights a legal development where a Second Circuit panel offered support for Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt to keep a deposition sealed. The majority of the document (5 out of 6 pages) is completely redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00005372.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court filing from October 22, 2021, which lists proposed questions for potential jurors in a criminal case. A comment from the defense argues that juror background questions should be handled through a written questionnaire rather than live questioning (voir dire). The defense supports this by citing precedent from high-profile cases involving Elizabeth Holmes, Robert Kelly, and Keith Rainier, and notes that a verdict in another case was overturned due to jury deceit, highlighting the need for thorough vetting.
DOJ-OGR-00005326.jpg
This document is page 4 of a proposed juror questionnaire filed in a federal criminal case on October 22, 2021. It contains standard background questions for potential jurors, along with comments reflecting a legal dispute between the defendant and the government. The defense argues for including these detailed questions in the written questionnaire, citing precedent from other high-profile cases, while the government objects, arguing the questions are inappropriate for a written form and are better suited for oral voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00005209.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 13, 2021. It presents legal arguments justifying the use of jury questionnaires to screen for bias (actual, implied, and inferred) during voir dire. The text cites precedents from the Second Circuit and references other high-profile cases involving extensive pretrial publicity, such as those of Jeffrey Skilling (Enron), R. Kelly, Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos), and Keith Rainier (Nexium), to support the argument.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity