Vaughn Bowman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Eli Broverman
|
Co panelist |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Randy Sternke
|
Co panelist |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-17 | N/A | A panel discussion titled 'Robo Advisors: Shedding Light on the Potential Opportunity', where spe... | 2016 Future of Financials C... | View |
| 2016-11-17 | N/A | Bank of America Merrill Lynch held its '2016 Future of Financials Conference'. | Unknown | View |
| 0017-01-01 | N/A | Bank of America Merrill Lynch's '2016 Future of Financials Conference', which included a panel di... | Not specified | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010196.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III on March 7, 2013, regarding the sentencing of David Parse. It argues for leniency, distinguishing Parse's role as a broker executing trades from those who designed the illegal tax shelters (referencing Donna Guerin and the Jenkins law firm). The document appears to be an exhibit (A-5941) filed in the later Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) in 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00009517.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III dated March 7, 2013, argues for a lenient sentence for their client, David Parse. The letter contends that Parse's role was limited to that of a broker executing trades, not designing or marketing illegal tax shelters, and that the sentencing guidelines are too harsh for his level of culpability. It further notes that of all the brokers performing similar functions for the law firm Jenkins, only Parse and Craig Brubaker were prosecuted, with Parse being the only one convicted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017239.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft (dated 4.2.12) written by a legal scholar (likely Alan Dershowitz). The text discusses the tension between privacy rights and the First Amendment, citing personal attacks by Norman Finkelstein and the historical legal framework established by Louis Brandeis. It details the specific legal case of Brooke Shields attempting to stop the publication of nude photos taken of her as a child, noting that the author advised a former student representing Shields that the case would be difficult due to laws against prior restraint.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014367.jpg
This document from a 2016 conference summarizes panel discussions on the future of the payments industry and robo-advisors. A survey indicates a belief that the payments industry will be controlled by large incumbent institutions enabled by innovative tech companies (59%). The document also covers the growth drivers for robo-advisors, such as a lack of quality advice for small investors and a desire for transparency, with market size predictions for the sector to surpass $1 trillion in assets.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity