This document is a Motion to Reschedule Hearing filed on May 29, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Robert C. Josefsberg, representing Plaintiffs Jane Doe 101 and 102, requests to move a hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, because he will be attending his 50th College Reunion in Hanover, New Hampshire. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal teams associated with Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and various plaintiffs in related cases.
This document is an email thread from May 13, 2020, regarding therapy resources for victims of Jeffrey Epstein. An attorney ('Of Counsel') writes to an unidentified recipient (likely within the FBI or DOJ) seeking counseling options for clients located in the West Palm Beach area, referencing similar assistance previously provided by the FBI in New York. The email is forwarded internally with a query about the sender's identity.
This document is an email chain from May 20, 2020, discussing therapy options for three of Jeffrey Epstein's victims who were original plaintiffs in South Florida civil suits. The attorney representing them requests 12 counseling sessions and emphasizes the need for strict confidentiality, noting that the victims have never been publicly identified. The email notably mentions that Epstein used his resources to buy 'real-looking fake credentials for people to pose as FBI agents,' causing the victims to distrust direct contact from anyone claiming to be law enforcement.
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
This document is an email dated October 18, 2019, circulated within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). It forwards a New York Times opinion piece by Gail Collins from July 2019 titled 'Trump Doesn’t Know About Labor,' which criticizes Labor Secretary Alex Acosta for his role in brokering Jeffrey Epstein's lenient plea deal in Florida and highlights Donald Trump's past social relationship with Epstein.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 2020, discussing a press inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter, Stephen Rex Brown, provides details of a story alleging that in 2016, SDNY prosecutors (specifically an AUSA named Kramer) met with victims' lawyers but declined to pursue new charges against Jeffrey Epstein or perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The internal SDNY response suggests they have no record of the second meeting mentioned and decide not to push back against the story.
This document is an internal DOJ/SDNY email chain from June 18, 2019, circulating a Washington Post opinion article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein’s scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the American justice system.' The article criticizes the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of wealthy predators like Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, and Leslie Moonves, and calls for the unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell's files and new investigations into Epstein's conduct in New York, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. It specifically highlights the role of David Boies in representing victims and criticizes Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for the previous non-prosecution agreement.
This document is an email dated July 11, 2019, forwarding a New York Times opinion column by Gail Collins titled 'Trump Doesn’t Know About Labor.' The article criticizes Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for his role in securing a lenient plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein while U.S. Attorney in South Florida. It also highlights past comments by President Trump regarding his friendship with Epstein and discusses the transfer of the Epstein case to federal prosecutors in New York. The email subject line notes that the sender highlighted a specific part of the text, likely referring to the section about New York prosecutors.
This document is a legal filing arguing for the dismissal of a petition due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The central argument is that the Petitioners lack Article III standing because they cannot demonstrate a sufficient "injury in fact" that is redressable by the court. The filing cites numerous legal precedents, including Supreme Court decisions, to support its position on the requirements for standing.
This FedEx invoice, dated November 18, 2002, details two shipments sent by Cecilia Steen and Jeffrey E Epstein from their New York address on November 14, 2002. One package was sent to ALLTEL IND OF SOUTH FLORIDA, and the other was sent to Dott E Wilson at Palm Beach National Bank & Tru. Both packages were delivered the following day, November 15, 2002.
This incident report details the execution of a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's residence, where various items including a notepad, high school transcript, sexual lubricant, and photographs of naked teenage girls were found. It also describes delays in filing the search warrant and inventory due to Hurricane Wilma, necessitating an order to seal signed by Judge Johnson. The document outlines the roles of several law enforcement personnel, including an unnamed investigator, Captain Gudger, Evidence Specialist Annette Badger, CSI Kim Pavlik, and Detective Joseph Recarey, in the search and evidence collection conducted on October 20, 2005, at 358 El Brillo.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated February 17, 2006, documents an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details an interview with Haley Robson regarding her encounters with Epstein, and outlines several investigative steps taken in March and April 2005. These steps include drafting subpoenas for phone records, conducting surveillance on Epstein's property at 358 El Brillo, confirming his valid concealed weapons permit, and identifying an item from his trash as a sex toy by consulting an online retailer.
This document details prosecutor Acosta's explanation to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for pursuing a state-level, pre-indictment resolution in the Epstein case. Acosta cited the novelty of trafficking prosecutions at the time, issues with witnesses and evidence, and the belief that a state resolution offered more flexibility than a federal one. The document also includes statements from other legal professionals, Menchel and Villafaña, who described the general aversion of federal judges in the Southern District of Florida to binding plea agreements like Rule 11(c) pleas.
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for user 'dixiedelight5' (associated with the Epstein investigation via the DOJ-OGR stamp). It contains comments from friends dated January 31 and February 1, 2006. One commenter mentions being sick with Strep Throat, seeing a person named Tory at the South Florida Fair, and asks about a rumor that the profile owner is engaged. Another user posts lyrics from the band Fall Out Boy.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report narrative detailing the execution of a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's residence on October 20, 2005. It describes the recovery of evidence including notepads, a high school transcript, sexual lubricant, and photographs of naked teenage girls, as well as the logistical challenges caused by Hurricane Wilma.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, details investigative activities from late March and early April 2005 related to Jeffrey Epstein. The report documents a conversation with Haley Robson about her interactions with Epstein, the drafting of subpoenas for phone records, surveillance conducted on Epstein's property at 358 El Brillo, and the identification of an item from a trash pull. It also notes a check on Epstein's concealed weapons permit and online business queries.
This document is page 3 of a narrative text (likely a book or investigative report) included in House Oversight Committee files. Labeled 'Chapter I', it introduces a 14-year-old girl under the pseudonym 'Mary' in South Florida in February 2005, describing her appearance and bedroom environment. The text notes that names and identifying details have been changed.
This document is a page from a Palm Beach Police Department incident report concerning Case No. 1-05-000368 involving Jeffrey Epstein. It details the collection of evidence from Epstein's residence, including notepads, a high school transcript, sexual lubricant, photographs, and video tapes, followed by a meeting with Epstein's attorney, Guy Fronstein. The report also notes delays in filing paperwork due to Hurricane Wilma and begins a narrative by Gregory A. Parkinson describing the assembly of the Crime Scene Investigative Team on October 20, 2005.
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (page 283) included in House Oversight Committee files. It details the post-Epstein lives of several 'girls,' including 'Mary' (arrested for shoplifting in 2010) and Wendy Dobbs (pursuing nursing/hospitality). It establishes a financial link between Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, and a woman named Marcinko (alias Sarah Kensington), noting that Mark owned the building where she lived.
This document contains pages 276 and 277 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely by James Patterson), stamped as House Oversight evidence. It details Virginia Roberts's allegations against Prince Andrew, including her sworn statement that she was instructed by Jeffrey Epstein to 'exceed' expectations and give the Prince whatever he wanted. The text also covers legal maneuvers, such as Buckingham Palace refusing letters, a Florida judge striking allegations from the record as 'lurid details,' and Barry Krischer refusing to comment on Epstein in 2016.
This document appears to be a scanned page (276) from a book, likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich', stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew in early 2015, specifically Virginia Roberts's allegations of sexual contact and the Prince's subsequent denials issued from Davos and Buckingham Palace. It also touches on real estate transactions involving the Prince and a Kazakh billionaire, as well as a brief mention of State Attorney Barry Krischer's refusal to comment on Epstein in 2016.
This document is a scanned excerpt from a book by James Patterson (page 92) stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details Jeffrey Epstein's early life, including his childhood in Sea Gate, his time at the volatile Lafayette school, and anecdotes about his character, such as paying for a porter's wife's organ transplant. It also touches on his brother Mark, his nickname 'Eppy', his hobbies (piano, stamps), and briefly mentions his time at Cooper Union on the adjacent page.
This document is page 6 of a telephone interview transcript between Virginia Roberts and an interviewer (JS) regarding the case Edwards adv. Epstein. Virginia details her transition from working at Mar-a-Lago to working for Epstein full-time, identifies her father as Sky William Roberts (a former Mar-a-Lago maintenance supervisor), and discusses media reports involving Prince Andrew. She concludes by explaining her motivation for cooperating is to seek justice for herself and other victims and to prevent the procurement of young girls.
A letter dated July 25, 2014, from MC2 Models Miami to the Department of Homeland Security supporting an O-1 visa petition for Jean-Luc Brunel. The letter asserts Brunel's 'Extraordinary Ability' as an Art Director and Talent Coordinator and notes he already holds O-1 status. It details the prestige of MC2 Models (formerly Karin Models) and the significance of the Miami Beach fashion market to justify the petition.
This document is page 2 of a report by HSA Engineers & Scientists addressing water quality concerns in the Town of Palm Beach. It confirms that the water supplied by the City of West Palm Beach meets USEPA and FDEP standards, while suggesting Reverse Osmosis systems for residents desiring extra protection. The text also outlines the franchise agreement between the Town and the City for water supply and details a one-time sampling event authorized by the Town to verify water safety.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity