ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Court (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
|
Presiding judge |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
EFTA00014671.pdf
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated May 12, 2021, arguing for the enforcement of a subpoena for evidence controlled by the law firm Boies, Schiller, and Flexner (BSF). The defense seeks the full production of a journal kept by 'Accuser-2' in 1996, arguing that the government is relying on selective excerpts to support its case while ignoring potentially exculpatory context in the rest of the journal. The letter also addresses disputes over the production of a pair of boots and original photographs, accusing the government of interfering with the defense's investigation and practicing 'selective ignorance.'
EFTA00014636.pdf
This document is a letter dated May 14, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a one-week extension (to May 21, 2021) to file a joint letter regarding the pretrial schedule in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the prosecution and defense conferred by phone for 45 minutes on the previous day but require more time to resolve disagreements on scheduling proposals. The signatory names of the Assistant U.S. Attorneys are redacted.
EFTA00014590.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 15, 2020. Judge Alison J. Nathan sets the schedule for discovery deadlines, motion filings, and establishes a trial date of July 12, 2021.
EFTA00013307.pdf
This document is an Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court found that Maxwell presents a significant flight risk due to her substantial financial resources, international ties (citizenship in France and UK), and lack of candor regarding her finances. The proposed $28.5 million bail package and offer to waive extradition rights were deemed insufficient to reasonably assure her appearance at trial.
EFTA00013301.pdf
This document is an email dated April 29, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). The email transmits a letter from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal counsel in response to a court order from earlier that day, noting that the letter was not filed electronically because the MDC is not a formal party to the case.
EFTA00013199.pdf
Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 30, 2020. The Court ruled in favor of the Government regarding a protective order, denying Maxwell's request to publicly name victims who had previously spoken to the media and denying her request to restrict witnesses from using discovery materials for purposes other than trial preparation.
EFTA00011192.pdf
This document is a legal opinion provided by David Perry QC regarding the extradition law of England and Wales in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the United States. It outlines the extradition process between the UK and US, potential bars to extradition, human rights considerations, and the implications of Ms. Maxwell waiving her right to extradition. The document concludes that if Ms. Maxwell were to abscond to the UK, it is highly unlikely she would be granted bail or successfully resist extradition.
EFTA00011179.pdf
This document is an email dated December 8, 2020, from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of unredacted exhibits O through X, related to a Renewed Bail Motion in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The documents were filed under seal pursuant to a court order.
EFTA00011161.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 15, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20cr330). The correspondence originates from the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, informing counsel (including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca) of a memo endorsement related to the defense's motion on FRE 412, which was attached as a PDF and scheduled to be filed on the public docket the following Monday.
EFTA00011157.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 15, 2021. The Government argues against the defense's proposed November 15 deadline for filing motions under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding victim sexual behavior), requesting an earlier deadline to allow for proper hearings before trial. The document includes a handwritten order by Judge Nathan setting the motion deadline for October 27, 2021, with a tentative hearing on November 5, 2021.
EFTA00011137.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter received from a lawyer for an alleged victim regarding trial attendance and establishes protocols for public and victim access during the trial, including COVID-19 measures and overflow rooms. Contact information is provided for Wendy Olson (Victim Witness Unit) and Joseph Pecorino (District Executive's Office) to coordinate access for victims and the defendant's family.
EFTA00011135.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence involves the submission of a joint proposed juror questionnaire and voir dire questions, with Judge Nathan's chambers requesting Word document versions. Additionally, the Assistant United States Attorney confirms the production of Jencks Act material and exhibits to the defense.
EFTA00011113.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell). The correspondence is between the Judge's chambers (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), Defense Counsel (Bobbi C. Sternheim), and the US Attorney's Office. The discussion concerns the filing of a Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire, requests to seal documents, and the Court's request for copies of Jencks Act material (evidence regarding government witnesses).
EFTA00010414.pdf
This document is a legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense cites a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision overturning Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise, arguing that this precedent supports dismissing charges against Maxwell based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the government is violating due process by reneging on the specific immunity granted to Maxwell in the NPA.
EFTA00010410.pdf
This document contains an email chain between defense attorney Christian Everdell and US Attorney's Office prosecutors (Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, et al.) dated June 30, 2021, regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that the defense has no redactions to propose regarding a court opinion and coordinates the filing of a joint letter to the court. The document also includes the official Notice of Electronic Filing (Order 305) from Judge Alison J. Nathan, which set the deadlines for these redaction proposals.
EFTA00010294.pdf
This document is a Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 25, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denied Maxwell's requests to immediately disclose the identities of three alleged victims and to order the Bureau of Prisons to release her into the general population, deeming the former premature and the latter unnecessary given current accommodations. However, the Court ordered the Government to provide written status updates every 90 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials and ability to communicate with counsel.
EFTA00010217.pdf
This document is an email from Nicole Simmons (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.) to Judge Nathan's chambers in the U.S. v. Maxwell case, dated November 13, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for filing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The filing was submitted under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions by the government.
EFTA00010196.pdf
This document is a joint letter from the prosecution and defense to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government argues that a written response from MDC legal counsel is sufficient to address concerns, while the Defense argues that Warden Heriberto Tellez should appear in person to explain 'onerous' conditions such as 15-minute flashlight checks and body scans. Judge Nathan added a handwritten order at the end requiring MDC legal counsel to submit a letter by December 4, 2020, before determining if further action is needed.
EFTA00010194.pdf
This document is a court order dated December 1, 2020, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order directs the Government to respond by December 2, 2020, to Maxwell's previous letter requests regarding sealed filings and proposed redactions. It also states that the letters in question will remain temporarily sealed while the court resolves the redaction request.
EFTA00010184.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell trial (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Defense attorney Nicole Simmons forwards a response to the government's motion to preclude the testimony of expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow the government to review for necessary redactions.
EFTA00010182.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 11, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell case (20cr330). It contains a notification from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers to defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding a sealed memorandum opinion and order. The forwarding commentary discusses a '412 order' (likely referring to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 regarding sexual behavior evidence) and the Court's understanding of concessions made by the defense.
EFTA00010105.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated November 18, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests a ruling that the birth certificates of Minor Victims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 be deemed self-authenticating under Federal Rules of Evidence 902 and 902(4), thereby avoiding the need to call records custodians from various states (RI, MO, NY, CA, MA) to testify at trial. The defense had refused to stipulate to the authenticity of these records despite having no reason to doubt them.
EFTA00010102.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 18, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan. The correspondence concerns a redaction error in a legal filing (Dkt. No. 453) related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, where a witness's name was inadvertently exposed. The Government requested the removal of the document from the electronic docket (ECF) and subsequently submitted a corrected version.
EFTA00010040.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The government requests clarification on two points: limiting cross-examination details about witnesses' specific acting roles (e.g., genre of movies) to prevent identification, and barring courtroom sketch artists from drawing exact likenesses of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms.
EFTA00010037.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 12, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government seeks clarification on two pretrial matters: limiting cross-examination regarding the specific genres of witnesses' acting careers (e.g., action vs. soap opera) to protect their identities, and ensuring the ban on courtroom sketch artists drawing the likenesses of pseudonymized witnesses.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity