East 71st Street
LocationRelationship Network
076.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on December 8, 2020, in the U.S. District Court (SDNY). The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, along with associated entities) agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice because the plaintiff resolved her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order was signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
057.pdf
A Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on February 13, 2020, in the civil forfeiture case USA v. Nine East 71st Street (Case No. 19-cv-07625). The notice alerts parties that the transcript for a scheduling conference held on February 11, 2020, has been filed by Court Reporter Carole Ludwig.
053.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 14, 2020, coordinating pretrial supervision for multiple civil lawsuits filed by women alleging sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Debra Freeman orders the parties to submit a discovery schedule by February 6, 2020, and schedules a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020. The document lists thirteen specific cases involving plaintiffs such as Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe, and others against Indyke and other Epstein-related entities.
045.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a Motion to Dismiss in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. The plaintiff, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse beginning in 2001 at age 16, argues that the corporate defendants (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, and NES LLC) are liable for negligence, negligent security, and negligent supervision. The memorandum asserts these entities were integral to Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, with employees facilitating the recruitment and scheduling of victims, and argues that claims are valid under the New York Child Victims Act.
043.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 13, 2019, regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. Edwards requests a five-day extension (until December 18, 2019) to file the Plaintiff's Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The letter notes that the Defendants have been conferred with and have no objection to the extension.
042.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of VE v. Nine East 71st Street Corporation (an Epstein-affiliated entity). Judge Alison J. Nathan directs the court clerk to clear specific docket numbers (4 and 24) which were resolved by a previous docket entry.
038.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law filed on November 29, 2019, by the defendants (Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities) in the case VE v. Indyke et al. The defendants move to dismiss several counts of the plaintiff's complaint, arguing that the battery claim is time-barred and not revived by the Child Victims Act because it is distinct from claims under NY Penal Law § 130. Furthermore, they argue that negligence claims against the corporate defendants (Nine East, FTC, and NES) are based on vague, conclusory allegations that fail to establish a duty of care, breach, or proximate cause, and that punitive damages are legally barred against an estate.
034.pdf
A court notice filed on November 26, 2019, in the civil forfeiture case (19-CV-07625) against 'Nine East 71st Street' (Jeffrey Epstein's New York property). Court Reporter Mary Greco notifies the parties that the transcript for the Case Management Conference held on November 21, 2019, has been filed and outlines the deadlines and rules for requesting redactions.
031.pdf
This document is an Order of Reference from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) filed on November 18, 2019. Judge Alison J. Nathan refers the civil case (1:19-cv-07625) between plaintiff 'VE' and defendant 'Nine East 71st Street, Corporation' (Epstein's property entity) to a Magistrate Judge for general pretrial proceedings, including scheduling, discovery, and settlement.
021.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated September 18, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The letter confirms an agreement between the parties to accept service of the complaint and extends the defendants' deadline to respond until November 15, 2019; the request was 'So Ordered' by the judge on September 19, 2019.
010.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 6, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC. The summons is specifically addressed to Financial Trust Company, Inc. in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, instructing them to respond to the complaint represented by attorney J. Stanley Pottinger.
018.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings cover the scheduling of bail hearings, the government's confirmation of its obligation to notify victims, and preliminary arguments regarding the 2007/2008 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues the NPA bars this prosecution, while the government asserts the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York and that the current indictment involves separate conduct and victims.
006.pdf
This document is a letter from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel to Judge Richard Berman arguing for pretrial release on bail. The defense proposes strict conditions including home detention, GPS monitoring, and a substantial bond secured by Epstein's $77 million Manhattan home and private jet, with his brother and friend as co-sureties. The letter argues Epstein is not a flight risk (citing his U.S. ties and surrender of passport) and that the current charges are barred by a 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement.
038.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al., staying proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are ordered to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
046.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The document lists numerous civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (Epstein's estate executors) by various victims (Does, Farmer, Helm, etc.). The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.
051.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order lists numerous civil cases brought by victims (many under pseudonyms like Jane Doe, Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe) against Indyke (Epstein's estate executor) and other entities. The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.
EFTA00031566.pdf
This document is a Property Summary Report dated July 19, 2019, prepared by London & Thurber, LLC regarding the property at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY. The report identifies the owner as Maple, Inc. (a U.S. Virgin Islands Corp) and notes a 'Lis Pendens' (pending lawsuit) filed by the United States of America against Jeffrey Epstein on July 11, 2019 (Case No. 19CR490). The property has an estimated market value of over $75 million.
EFTA00020185.pdf
This document is a transcript of the initial court conference for United States v. Jeffrey Epstein held on July 8, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman. Key topics discussed include the scheduling of a bail hearing, the controversy surrounding the 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) which the defense argues bars this prosecution, and the government's stance that the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York. The court also addresses Epstein's sex offender status, the recent search of his Manhattan townhouse, and sets a schedule for bail submissions and the next hearing on July 15, 2019.
EFTA00001494.pdf
This is a photograph of an interior space, likely inside Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion. The image depicts an opulent hallway featuring a polished marble floor with a diamond pattern, elaborate gold-leaf molding on the walls and door frames, a fireplace with a marble mantel, ornate gold console tables, and a large dark wooden double door at the end of the corridor. The only text present is the Bates stamp 'EFTA00001494' in the bottom right corner.
EFTA00001055.pdf
A photograph showing the interior of a room, likely inside Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse. The room features dark patterned wallpaper, beige carpeting, and a wooden cabinet filled with various bottles and toiletries (potentially spa or hair products). A small side table holds a white landline telephone, a tissue box, and a digital clock reading 4:08. A large wooden doorway leads into a dark, black marble-lined space. On the right wall hangs a large framed painting depicting a nude female figure lying amidst a pile of urban debris or trash. The image bears the Bates stamp EFTA00001055.
EFTA00001034.pdf
A photograph showing the interior of an office, likely within Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion. The image depicts a large wooden desk featuring an Apple iMac computer, a landline telephone, an 'At-A-Glance' desk calendar (appearing to show July 2019), loose papers, and personal items including framed photos, one of which is redacted. The room features ornate wooden paneling and heavy curtains. The image is tagged with evidence number EFTA00001034.
EFTA00000844.pdf
A surveillance or evidence photograph depicting the street intersection of 5th Avenue and East 71st Street in New York City. The image shows typical city traffic, including a TopView tour bus and yellow taxis, one displaying an ad for 'Mean Girls on Broadway'. The location is significant as it is the corner of the block housing Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion (9 East 71st Street). The document bears the ID EFTA00000844.
EFTA00000840.pdf
This document is a photograph of the exterior facade of the Herbert N. Straus House located at 9 East 71st Street in New York City, which served as Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence. The image displays the limestone building front, including the large wooden arched entrance door, ground floor arched windows, a second-floor balcony with iron railings, and trees obscuring part of the upper floors. The file code EFTA00000840 is printed in the bottom right corner.
DOJ-OGR-00000390.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The court discusses a search conducted at Epstein's East 71st Street residence over the previous weekend and questions the impact of discovered materials on his sex offender status. Prosecutor Rossmiller describes the materials as 'extremely concerning' regarding bail, while defense attorney Weingarten notes they have not yet seen the 'pictures' in question.
DOJ-OGR-00016901.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Ms. Menninger, argues that a statement about when Mr. Epstein abandoned a property is not a settled fact. She contends that defense witnesses could have testified that Epstein lived on East 71st Street prior to 1996, contradicting the idea he abandoned it then, and references a prior opinion by Judge Chin to support her argument that the facts are disputable. The transcript ends with the presiding judge asking to see the document under discussion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity