Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Rahman

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00003067.jpg

This document is page 133 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It presents legal arguments and case law precedents regarding government misconduct, specifically the high burden required to prove 'outrageous' government conduct that would warrant dismissal of an indictment. The text argues that relief is only appropriate if the misconduct prejudiced the defense, and that suppression of evidence is the standard remedy rather than dismissal.

Legal brief / court filing (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002955.jpg

This document is page 21 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which corresponds to the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The page lists various legal precedents (case law citations) ranging from 'United States v. Rahimi' to 'United States v. Rosa' used to support legal arguments in the main brief. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002955.

Legal filing (table of authorities)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005210.jpg

This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 342) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 13, 2021. The defense argues for 'individual voir dire' during jury selection, citing the 'tsunami' of negative pretrial publicity surrounding Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein since Epstein's arrest in July 2019 and death in August 2019. The text references Supreme Court precedent regarding the necessity of questioning jurors individually to avoid bias in high-profile cases.

Legal filing / court motion
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search