McCARTHY

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
1
Events
1
Documents
3

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
location United States
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1969-01-01 N/A Legal case: McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00000205.tif

This legal document discusses the requirements for voluntary and knowing plea agreements, emphasizing that a defendant must be aware of the consequences and that the United States cannot unilaterally change agreement terms. It cites Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding plea colloquies and asserts that the Department of Justice has significant leverage during plea negotiations, even in atypical non-prosecution agreements.

Legal document / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009969.jpg

This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of 'United States of America, v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.'. The page lists numerous words and proper names (such as McCarthy, McDonough, and Massachusetts) and provides the page and line numbers where they can be found in the full transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00009969.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009945.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad, regarding her failure to disclose her background, which includes being a suspended lawyer and having a husband with a significant criminal record. The attorneys question whether she intentionally concealed this information to get on the jury and whether she holds any bias towards the defendants or the government, which she denies.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity