| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Legal case: McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 | N/A | View |
This legal document discusses the requirements for voluntary and knowing plea agreements, emphasizing that a defendant must be aware of the consequences and that the United States cannot unilaterally change agreement terms. It cites Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding plea colloquies and asserts that the Department of Justice has significant leverage during plea negotiations, even in atypical non-prosecution agreements.
This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of 'United States of America, v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.'. The page lists numerous words and proper names (such as McCarthy, McDonough, and Massachusetts) and provides the page and line numbers where they can be found in the full transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00009969.
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad, regarding her failure to disclose her background, which includes being a suspended lawyer and having a husband with a significant criminal record. The attorneys question whether she intentionally concealed this information to get on the jury and whether she holds any bias towards the defendants or the government, which she denies.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity