| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brown
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Brown by prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach regarding the authentication of Government Exhibit 21, identified as a report from the New York State DMV 'compass database' containing ID cards and driver's licenses.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brown. The witness identifies Government Exhibit 21 as a fair and accurate report from the New York State DMV's 'compass database,' which they state is used to store records of ID cards and driver's licenses in the ordinary course of business. An attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, is noted as offering the exhibit on behalf of the government.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brown, who works as a supervisor/investigator. Brown describes the process for obtaining an identification card from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), including the required application steps, personal information, and the types of original documents (e.g., social security card, passport) that must be presented for verification.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, seemingly submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (indicated by the Bates stamp). The text provides a legal argument regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), asserting that criminal defendants do not have the right to compel the disclosure of a victim's identity, address, or private records (such as mental health records) prior to trial. It cites various legal precedents and specifically acknowledges the work of victims' rights litigator Wendy Murphy.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 35 of 78), likely authored or submitted by David Schoen, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17. The text argues against the Advisory Committee's proposed rules for defense subpoenas, claiming they insufficiently protect victims' confidential information and violate the Rules Enabling Act. It cites *United States v. Nixon* to establish the standard for subpoenas (relevancy, admissibility, specificity).
This FBI evidence log (Form FD-192), dated September 6, 2006, details 22 items of property acquired on August 28, 2006, in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein case (31E-MM-108062). The items, including numerous micro and video cassettes, emails from the DMV, and floor plans, were sourced from Epstein's Palm Beach residence, with some materials noted as being from a "trash pull." The document contains redactions protecting law enforcement information and shows evidence being cataloged by the FBI's Miami office, with original case numbers from the Palm Beach Police Department.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity