Graham
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Connor
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
DOJ-OGR-00008451.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a court filing from December 21, 2021, details a joint proposal by the prosecution ('the Government') and the defense regarding public access to trial exhibits. They propose releasing slides after closing arguments to balance the public's right to access with the defendant's right to a fair trial and victim privacy, citing the 'United States v. Graham' case. A footnote describes an alternative government proposal to provide redacted slides beforehand, which the defense opposes.
DOJ-OGR-00008442.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on December 19, 2021, outlines a joint proposal by the prosecution and defense regarding the timing of public access to trial slides. The parties agree to release the slides after the conclusion of the trial day to balance public access with the privacy of victims and the defendant's right to a fair trial. A footnote reveals a disagreement over an alternative proposal by the Government to provide redacted printed slides to the public before summation, which the defense opposes.
DOJ-OGR-00003065.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically outlining the applicable law concerning the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. It defines and distinguishes between procedural and substantive due process by citing several court cases, including Martinez v. McAleenan and United States v. Salerno. The text highlights the two-step analysis for procedural due process and notes the Supreme Court's reluctance to expand the concept of substantive due process, as stated in Washington v. Glucksberg.
DOJ-OGR-00002941.jpg
This document is page 7 of 239 (internally numbered 'vi') from a legal filing, Document 204 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of cases, listing legal precedents with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The footer includes a Department of Justice document identifier, DOJ-OGR-00002941.
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
This legal document is a page from a government filing arguing in favor of a limited sealing request to protect the identities of minor victims. The government asserts that this request is minimally burdensome and legally sound, citing precedents where victim privacy outweighs public access, especially for evidence not yet shared in open court. It directly refutes the defense's claim that the request violates Second Circuit law by distinguishing the cases the defense relies upon.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity