Federal District Court for the District of Oregon
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00028452.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from June 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and their Victim Witness Coordinator regarding the impending arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence reveals that the investigation was covert at the time, with charges expected within a week, and highlights a strong desire to avoid the failures of the previous Southern District of Florida investigation regarding victims' rights. Logistics for a victim hotline (866-874-8900) and coordination between SDNY, the FBI, and the C-20 squad are discussed in detail.
EFTA00018384.pdf
This document is an email containing the full text of a New York Times article from July 19, 2019, detailing Judge Richard M. Berman's decision to deny Jeffrey Epstein bail. The article outlines the judge's reasoning, citing Epstein as a flight risk due to his immense wealth ($559 million in assets) and international properties, and a danger to the community due to his 'uncontrollable' fixation on minors. It also details items found in his safe, including a fake Austrian passport and cash, and alleges witness tampering via wire transfers and threats.
DOJ-OGR-00021239.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a report (likely by the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility) reviewing the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the US Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. It details Alexander Acosta's justification for the non-prosecution agreement, citing the difficulty of federal trafficking prosecutions at the time (2006-2007) and a preference for state resolution. The document also discusses the legal strategy regarding Rule 11(c) binding pleas and the interaction between federal and state prosecutors, noting the State Attorney's Office desire for 'political cover'.
DOJ-OGR-00010142.jpg
This document is page 7 of Stephen Gillers' Curriculum Vitae, filed as Exhibit A-5859 in a legal case. It details his prior employment from 1968 to 1978, including roles at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and as a judicial clerk. It also lists selected testimonies he provided to legislative bodies regarding judicial nominations and legal reform acts between 1981 and 1988.
DOJ-OGR-00009463.jpg
This document is a professional biography or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his employment history from 1968 to 1978. It lists his roles at various law firms and organizations, including his time as a judicial clerk, associate, and executive director. The document also provides a list of selected testimonies he delivered before various congressional and professional committees between 1981 and 1988 on topics such as judicial nominations and legal reform.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017182.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 95) from a manuscript draft, likely written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It discusses First Amendment legal theories regarding nudity, pornography, and 'fighting words,' citing Dershowitz's own 2002 book 'Shouting Fire' in a footnote. The document was produced as part of a House Oversight investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029319.jpg
This document, dated September 12, 2013, is a legal defense of attorney Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. It argues that Edwards did not 'pump' cases to investors, noting that he filed complaints against Epstein long before meeting Scott Rothstein or joining RRA. The text highlights that Epstein settled three cases (including one for 'Jane Doe') in July 2010 for significant sums via court-ordered mediation presided over by Judge Kenneth A. Marra, and that the Florida Bar dismissed Epstein's ethics complaint against Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021944.jpg
A page from a deposition transcript (marked Rough Draft) where a witness, identified as a former federal prosecutor and district court judge, testifies about the fairness of drawing adverse inferences when subjects like Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz invoke the Fifth Amendment or refuse to answer questions regarding sexual abuse and trafficking allegations made by 'Virginia'. The witness disputes the interviewer's suggestion that it is routine practice for witnesses facing criminal liability to take the Fifth on all substantive questions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity