Baker Botts
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
John W. Martin
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00032556.pdf
This document is a 'Law360 New York' email newsletter dated June 27, 2019. It contains summaries of various legal news stories, court rulings, and industry updates involving major companies like Goldman Sachs, Bitfinex, and Fox Corp. The document appears to have been flagged in an Epstein-related search due to the mention of 'Epstein Drangel LLP' in the job listings section on the final page, which is likely an unrelated intellectual property law firm.
EFTA00025073.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) from July and August 2021. It details the administrative processing of a 'Declaration' sent by Brendan F. Quigley of Baker Botts L.L.P., specifically instructing staff to save attached PDFs to a 'testifying witness 3500' folder on the 'Epstein share,' indicating the document relates to a government witness in the Epstein/Maxwell proceedings.
EFTA00022432.pdf
An email chain between attorney Brendan Quigley (Baker Botts) and likely SDNY prosecutors spanning from February 2020 to May 2021. The correspondence covers the signing of a proffer agreement in Feb 2020, a request in June 2020 regarding a civil attorney seeking to subpoena Quigley's client in connection with an Epstein civil case (which Quigley declined), and a request to schedule a call in May 2021.
EFTA00014668.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 2021 involving attorney Brendan Quigley of Baker Botts L.L.P. Discussing scheduling for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial ('GM' in attachment). The correspondence confirms that jury selection was scheduled for the week of November 15, 2021, with the trial beginning on November 29, 2021. Quigley confirms the availability of himself and a 'Mr. Rodgers' for these proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017912.jpg
This document contains a segment of a court opinion regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, specifically addressing legal claims under the Antiterrorism Act, RICO, and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. It outlines headnotes on legal standards for motions for reconsideration and sovereign immunity, and lists numerous attorneys and law firms representing the plaintiffs and defendants.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity