Anonymous Third Party
PersonRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031436.jpg
This document appears to be a written defense by an academic (likely Lawrence Krauss, based on the specific universities mentioned: Case Western, ASU, and ANU) responding to an investigative report. The author addresses two main issues: a confidential informal resolution regarding a student complaint at Case Western, and a sexual misconduct allegation involving a 'selfie' at a conference in November 2016. The text details that investigations by both ASU and ANU found the selfie allegation not credible, noting that the alleged victim did not file a complaint and the incriminating photo was never produced.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026770.jpg
This document appears to be a written defense by an academic (likely Lawrence Krauss, based on the specific mention of ASU, ANU, and the nature of the allegations) addressing a report about sexual misconduct. The writer refutes allegations of inappropriate touching during a selfie at a conference in November 2016, citing investigations by both Arizona State University (ASU) and Australian National University (ANU) that found the claims not credible. The writer argues the complaints were third-party hearsay and provides context regarding their aversion to camera flashes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021428.jpg
This document contains a detailed rebuttal, likely written by Dr. Lawrence Krauss, addressing sexual harassment allegations investigated by BuzzFeed News reporter Peter Aldhous. The text discusses specific investigations by Arizona State University (ASU) and Australian National University (ANU) regarding a 'selfie' incident in November 2016, where a third party alleged Krauss touched a woman's breast; Krauss denies the claim, citing university reports that found no evidence of physical contact. The document includes a forwarded email from Aldhous dated December 10, 2017, requesting an interview.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021409.jpg
This document is a detailed rebuttal, likely written by physicist Lawrence Krauss (based on the specific career trajectory and allegations mentioned), addressing two specific complaints of misconduct ('Item 2' and 'Item 6'). The author defends his interactions with a female student at Case Western Reserve University, stating their relationship was professional and mentorship-focused. He also addresses an allegation regarding a 'selfie' taken in November 2016 at an ANU-related event, citing an internal investigation that found the allegations not credible and noting the alleged victim never filed a complaint. The document appears to be part of a larger submission to the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity