This document is page 54040 from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, detailing a legal argument against a new rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The author contends the NLRB overstepped its statutory authority, citing legal precedents on agency power and the 'arbitrary and capricious' standard. Despite the user's framing, this document is entirely about U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any of their activities.
This document is a page from the Federal Register discussing comments and the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) responses regarding proposed rules on employee rights posters. The NLRB addresses suggestions concerning prohibitions on union insignia, employer spying or videotaping, and illegal conduct by both employers and unions. The Board generally declines to add more specific examples or language to the notice, arguing that the existing general statements are sufficient and that more detail could be confusing or impractical for a poster format.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity