Deputy Clerk
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Conrad
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Issuance of Certificate of Good Standing | Richmond, Virginia | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2008-07-22 | N/A | Certification that the document is a true copy. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| 2007-12-04 | N/A | Certification of True Copy | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2005-09-28 | Subpoena issuance | A State Attorney Subpoena (No. 05-595, PBPD Case #05-368) was issued by the Fifteenth Judicial Ci... | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
019-04.pdf
A Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Court of Virginia for attorney John Marcus McNichols. The document certifies his admission to the bar on June 7, 2004, and his current good standing as of June 29, 2023. This document was filed as an exhibit in federal case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (Doe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank) on June 30, 2023.
EFTA00028543.pdf
This document is an electronic Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated August 20, 2019. It notifies parties of a filing in the case 'United States of America v. Epstein' (Case No. 19-2221). The filing is a 'FRAP 42 Stipulation with Prejudice,' described as a 'Signed Stipulation to Withdraw Appeal,' indicating the legal closure of an appeal following the events of August 2019.
EFTA00028064.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated September 24, 2020. It confirms the filing of 'APPENDIX, volume 2 of 2' on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Case Number 20-3061). The document lists the electronic document stamp and notes that notice was mailed to a redacted list of recipients.
EFTA00027869.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated April 1, 2021. It confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in case number 21-770 (United States of America v. Maxwell). The list of recipients and the Deputy Clerk's name have been redacted.
EFTA00026918.pdf
This document is an automated PACER email notification from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated April 13, 2021. It confirms the filing of an 'Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in case number 21-58. The list of recipients for this notice has been redacted.
EFTA00026826.pdf
A Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding case 20-2413 ([Redacted] v. Maxwell). The document confirms that on October 9, 2020, a motion order was filed granting Ghislaine Maxwell's request for re-alignment of argument time. The document includes technical filing details and notes extensive redactions regarding the recipients of the notice.
EFTA00021008.pdf
This document is an automated 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, dated September 23, 2020. It confirms the filing of a letter on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case Number 20-3061). The original filename indicates the letter was a response to a government opposition regarding a motion to consolidate.
DOJ-OGR-00031605.jpg
This document is a State's Attorney Subpoena Duces Tecum from Palm Beach County, Florida, dated April 12, 2005. It commands T-Mobile Wireless to provide subscriber information and detailed call records for a specific phone number for the period of January 27, 2005, to April 4, 2005. The information is to be forwarded to Detective Michele Pagan of the Town of Palm Beach Police Department, and a T-Mobile representative is also ordered to appear before the State's Attorney for interrogation.
DOJ-OGR-00031382.jpg
This document is a State Attorney Subpoena issued on September 28, 2005, by the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. It commands Cingular Cellular Service, specifically its Custodian of Records, to provide subscriber information and call details for telephone number 561-308-0282, covering the period from February 2005 to the present, for a criminal investigation (PBPD Case #05-368). The subpoena was received and executed on the same date.
DOJ-OGR-00010217.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on March 11, 2022, regarding a motion for a new trial for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The hearing's purpose, as stated by the court, is to examine the responses of 'Juror 50' to a jury selection questionnaire, following a court order from February 24, 2022. The transcript begins with counsel for the government, the defense, and Juror 50 stating their appearances for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00009919.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a witness, likely Ms. Conrad, in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. The questioning focuses on her understanding of a court order and subpoena issued by Judge Pauley, her legal training, and her prior statements to court staff that she would not appear or testify. The witness also mentions having met Ms. Sternheim six times and having 'Googled' the questioner after a previous trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005373.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions and jury instructions. It specifically highlights disputes between the Government and the Defense regarding whether potential jurors should be asked live questions about their knowledge of or dealings with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text includes standard admonitions to jurors not to discuss the case and to report any outside communication attempts.
Refusal to testify
Ms. Conrad told the deputy clerk that she would not be testifying today.
Refusal to testify
Ms. Conrad told the deputy clerk that she would not be testifying today.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity