This handwritten legal document argues that Congress intentionally excluded specific child abuse definitions found in ยง 3509(a) when making technical corrections in 1994, suggesting these definitions apply to civil reporting rather than criminal statutes. The text cites legal precedents such as *Ibarra v. Holder*, *Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement*, and *Brown v. Gardner* to support principles of statutory interpretation regarding congressional intent and context.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity