Jeremy Bernstein
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Inference: International Review of Science
|
Contributor |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-01 | N/A | A collection of positive feedback and comments was compiled for the journal 'Inference: Internati... | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017088.jpg
This document is a Table of Contents for a book manuscript, dated April 2, 2012, with a House Oversight stamp. The text outlines an autobiography covering the author's life from Brooklyn to Yale, clerkships with Judge Bazelon and Justice Goldberg, and a legal career focused on the First Amendment, addressing topics such as the Pentagon Papers, Wikileaks, and pornography cases like 'Deep Throat' and 'I Am Curious Yellow'. Based on the specific clerkships and career trajectory described, the manuscript appears to be by Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017171.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) of a book, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific legal history and cases mentioned (Harry Reems, bestiality defense, etc.). The text discusses the evolution of the First Amendment, contrasting it with Charlton Heston's views on the Second Amendment, and lists the controversial types of speech the author has defended. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein case in which Dershowitz was involved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015119.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript, fictional work, or satire (possibly a novel featuring Richard Nixon as a narrator) included within a House Oversight document production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015119). The text features a surreal first-person narrative where the speaker (implied to be Nixon) discusses an evangelistic tour proposal from 'Billy' involving Colonel Sanders, and claims that during the infamous 18.5-minute Watergate tape gap, John Ehrlichman handed him a gram of cocaine and a surveillance report on Woodward and Bernstein. The content is highly sensational and likely fictional rather than a factual government record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015118.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir included in House Oversight evidence files. The narrator discusses political conspiracies regarding the 1976 election of Jimmy Carter, alleging his selection was based on psychological manipulation involving his resemblance to Howdy Doody. The text also alleges that major think tanks (Rand, Hudson, Stanford) are orchestrating a 'Christianization' of the US leading up to the year 2000, and mentions the narrator was personally approached by Billy Graham for conversion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022445.jpg
This document, dated November 2018, is a page of testimonials for the scientific journal 'Inference: International Review of Science'. It features positive feedback from five academics regarding the journal's content and editing. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022445' indicates this document was collected as part of an investigation by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight, likely related to the journal's funder, Jeffrey Epstein, who used the publication to bolster his public image as a patron of science.
Feedback on contribution and editing
So many thanks. This worked out very well. The editing was excellent although the caricature of me looked more like Donald Trump than me! I hope to work with you in the future. I read the issue with great interest and was pleased to see my quantum there. I thank the editors for their good editing.
Feedback on contribution and editing
So many thanks. This worked out very well. The editing was excellent although the caricature of me looked more like Donald Trump than me! I hope to work with you in the future. I read the issue with great interest and was pleased to see my quantum there. I thank the editors for their good editing.
Feedback on contribution and editing
So many thanks. This worked out very well. The editing was excellent although the caricature of me looked more like Donald Trump than me! I hope to work with you in the future. I read the issue with great interest and was pleased to see my quantum there. I thank the editors for their good editing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity