ARTHUR L. AIDALA
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a 'PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC' in case 22-1426-cr on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2023-07-27 | Legal filing | Filing of a Certificate of Compliance in Case 22-1426, certifying the document's word count and f... | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-07-27 | Legal filing | A legal document was submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell requesting that her case be remande... | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-02-28 | Legal filing | Filing of the Certificate of Compliance. | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-02-28 | Legal filing | Filing of a 'BRIEF AND SPECIAL APPENDIX FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT' in case 22-1426-cr. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
018.pdf
A letter from attorney Imran H. Ansari, representing non-party Alan Dershowitz, to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests that the Court order the plaintiff to file an amended complaint removing specific allegations regarding Dershowitz (paragraph 39) that the Court had previously ordered stricken as 'redundant, immaterial, impertinent, and/or scandalous' on December 23, 2019.
011.pdf
This document is a legal reply letter dated December 16, 2019, from attorneys representing Alan Dershowitz to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Dershowitz seeks to intervene in the civil case *Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein* to strike specific allegations in the complaint he deems scandalous and irrelevant, and to request sanctions against Farmer and her legal team (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP). The letter argues that the allegations against Dershowitz have no bearing on Farmer's claims of battery and emotional distress against the Epstein Estate and are part of a 'campaign of personal animus'.
EFTA00030155.pdf
Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.
EFTA00026703.pdf
This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00000065.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell). It addresses five appellate questions, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement barred Maxwell's prosecution and if her sentence was procedurally reasonable. The document also lists the attorneys involved for both the Appellee (United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York) and the Defendant-Appellant.
DOJ-OGR-00014853.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal opinion (likely from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction. It lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant). The text, authored by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, summarizes Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy related to minors, as well as her sentencing of concurrent prison terms.
DOJ-OGR-00000004.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated September 17, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution (Appellee) and the defense (Appellant), and summarizes that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentencing by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00021048.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a 'BRIEF AND SPECIAL APPENDIX FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT', submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 28, 2023. The filing is for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426-cr), where Maxwell is the Defendant-Appellant. The document lists her legal representation from the law firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins PC.
DOJ-OGR-00020827.jpg
This document is the cover page for an appendix (Volume 2 of 2) filed on February 28, 2023, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, case number 22-1426-cr. The case involves the United States of America vs. Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant), who is being represented by the law firm Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC.
DOJ-OGR-00020619.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume 1 of the Appendix filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of the United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426-cr). Dated February 28, 2023, it lists the legal counsel for Maxwell as Arthur L. Aidala, Diana Fabi Samson, and John M. Leventhal of the firm Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC. The document bears a DOJ bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00020619.
DOJ-OGR-00020596.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 28, 2022, from an appellate counsel at the law firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, P.C. to the Clerk of Court. The lawyer, newly assigned to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, requests an extension to file the Appellant's Brief, moving the deadline from October 14, 2022, to January 30, 2023. The justification for the request includes the voluminous nature of the case record (over 3,800 pages of transcripts and 738 docket entries) and the fact that the lawyer has been unable to meet with Maxwell following her recent transfer to a prison in Tallahassee, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00021880.jpg
This legal document is a court filing dated December 2, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. It identifies the legal counsel for both the appellant, Maxwell, and the appellee, the United States, and states that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentence from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00021850.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, detailing the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. Written by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, it lists the legal counsel for both sides and summarizes Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy, including her sentencing of concurrent prison terms totaling 240 months (20 years).
DOJ-OGR-00021845.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal petition filed on November 1, 2024, regarding Case 22-1426. Attorneys Diana Fabi Samson and Arthur L. Aidala, representing Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, request the court vacate a panel decision, overrule 'Annabi', and dismiss the indictment or remand for an evidentiary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00021825.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a 'PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC', submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on November 1, 2024. The petition is filed by attorneys Arthur L. Aidala and Diana Fabi Samson on behalf of their client, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The case is an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021797.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It lists the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant) and begins the written opinion by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes regarding Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy involving minors. The text details her conviction statutes and sentences of 60, 120, and 240 months imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00021777.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on July 27, 2023, by the law firm AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, PC on behalf of their client, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Diana Fabi Samson certifies that the associated legal filing adheres to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure for word count (6,723 words) and typeface.
DOJ-OGR-00021776.jpg
This document is the concluding page of a legal brief, dated July 27, 2023, filed on behalf of Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell. The brief requests that the matter be remanded to the District Court for a new trial, a hearing, or resentencing. It is respectfully submitted by her legal team from the law firm AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, PC.
DOJ-OGR-00021150.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on February 28, 2023, in Case 22-1426. It is submitted by the law firm AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMIN, PC on behalf of their client, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, certifying that a related court filing adheres to the court's specified word count and formatting requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00010658.jpg
This is a letter dated June 16, 2022, from Alan Dershowitz's attorneys to the U.S. prosecutors in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The attorneys inform the prosecution about a recent, confidential deposition of Virginia Giuffre from her civil lawsuit against Dershowitz, arguing it contains information critical to her credibility. They urge the prosecutors to obtain and review this deposition transcript before allowing Giuffre to provide a victim impact statement at Maxwell's upcoming sentencing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity