Unnamed lawyer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional custodial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A heated exchange (possibly apocryphal) between Justices Hugo Black and Felix Frankfurter during ... | Supreme Court | View |
| 2006-04-20 | Search conclusion | The search was concluded at approximately 3:05 p.m. The residence was secured and the defendant's... | 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Bea... | View |
EFTA00027342.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to an FBI agent dated July 23, 2019. The email discusses a renewed attempt to interview a female witness/victim whose lawyer has given permission for direct contact and provided her phone number, despite noting she is 'not great at following up.'
DOJ-OGR-00016134.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a judge provides preliminary instructions to a jury. The judge orders the jury not to discuss the case with anyone and explains that all parties and counsel are forbidden from interacting with them. The judge also details the courtroom's COVID-19 safety measures, including the use of a Plexiglas enclosure with a HEPA filter for witnesses and lawyers during testimony and opening statements.
DOJ-OGR-00016733.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Defense Attorney Ms. Menninger, The Court, and Government Attorney Ms. Moe discussing the procedure for a witness to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights. The Court and Defense agree that a simple letter or email from the witness's lawyer is insufficient to invoke these rights, and the Defense intends to ask for the subpoena to be enforced, requiring the witness to appear.
DOJ-OGR-00013142.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that someone took nude photos of her and discusses a previous lawsuit she filed, confirmng she hired a lawyer for it. The defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, successfully objects to questions regarding who made the decision on whom to sue. Carolyn also confirms she was deposed in 2009 but was not asked about her time working for an escort service during that deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00032880.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details the execution of a search warrant at 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005. The narrative, written by Officer Michael C. Dawson, describes the search of Jeffrey Epstein's property, identifying three men present (Janusz Banasiak, Daniel Estes, Mark Zeff), and cataloging the search of vehicles, rooms, and a safe opened by Banasiak. The report notes the seizure of a phone message book and other items from the safe, and mentions the presence of two massage tables in a closet.
DOJ-OGR-00002782.jpg
This document is the Preliminary Statement of a legal filing (Document 171) dated March 23, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's third application for bail. It outlines a massive proposed bail package including $28.5 million in bonds, $9.5 million in property, renunciation of foreign citizenship, and home confinement in NYC. The filing argues these strict conditions are sufficient to assure her appearance at trial.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017173.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 86) from a manuscript draft, dated April 2, 2012, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text is a philosophical and legal essay discussing the value of dissent, analyzing the First Amendment through the lens of a debate between Justices Hugo Black and Felix Frankfurter regarding the words 'Congress' and 'no.' The author (writing in the first person) expresses admiration for biblical and historical figures who challenged authority.
Who to sue
Conversations regarding the decision of who to sue in a lawsuit.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity