Kenneth Marra
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that Epstein's NPA violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Marra granted summary judgment to victims, ruling prosecutors violated the CVRA. | U.S. District Court | View |
| 2014-09-21 | N/A | Judge Marra signs Order on Intervenors' Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2014-05-02 | N/A | Protective Order Entered | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2013-06-18 | N/A | Previous Court Order unsealing correspondence. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2011-09-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth Marra rules that U.S. Attorney's Office should have notified victims. | Federal Court | View |
| 2011-08-12 | N/A | Arguments in federal court regarding the violation of victims' rights. | Federal Court, West Palm Beach | View |
| 2008-07-21 | N/A | Article published reporting that lawyer Brad Edwards asked Judge Marra to toss Epstein's plea deal. | Florida | View |
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
010-01.pdf
This is an Agreed Order from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The order grants Epstein permission to attend the deposition, mediation, or trial of Plaintiff Carolyn Andriano (in the related case CMA v. Epstein and Kellen, 08-CIV-80811), explicitly overriding a previous no-contact order [DE 238] for these specific legal proceedings.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
022.pdf
This is an amended complaint filed by Maria Farmer against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. Farmer alleges that Epstein sexually assaulted and trafficked her, and that his actions were part of a larger sex trafficking network. The complaint details Epstein's history of sexual abuse, his lenient 2008 plea deal, and the intimidation tactics used to silence victims.
010-12.pdf
This document is a Protective Order designated as Exhibit L (and Exhibit 1) in Case 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, filed in May 2014. Issued by Judge Kenneth Marra, it grants a motion by Intervenors (led by Roy Black) to keep correspondence between themselves and the United States Attorney's Office confidential ('CDM'). The order establishes strict protocols for the handling, marking, and limited disclosure of these materials during the litigation between Jane Does #1-2 and the United States.
071-01.pdf
This is a United States District Court Agreed Order from November 2009 in the Southern District of Florida. It grants Jeffrey Epstein's motion to attend mediation and explicitly states that a previous no-contact order does not prevent him from attending the deposition, mediation, or trial of Plaintiff Carolyn Andriano. The order references multiple related case numbers.
059-01.pdf
This is an Agreed Order from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated November 20, 2009. The order grants Jeffrey Epstein permission to attend the deposition, mediation, and trial involving Plaintiff Carolyn Andriano (referred to as CMA in the related case title), explicitly stating that a previous 'no contact order' does not preclude his attendance at these legal proceedings.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Juliette Bryant against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. It details allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein, beginning when Bryant was 20 years old, and describes Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network and his previous legal actions and statements regarding his conduct.
EFTA00030511.pdf
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
EFTA00023292.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on November 14, 2019, by Jane Doe 1000 against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff alleges she was recruited in late 1999 under the guise of modeling opportunities for Victoria's Secret, then subjected to years of sexual abuse, manipulation, and trafficking by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York and Palm Beach. The complaint details Epstein's wealth, his specific properties in NY and NM, his 2008 plea deal, his 2019 arrest and death, and specific instances of abuse involving Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031400.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article by Emily Michot regarding the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It details Judge Marra's ruling that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by misleading victims and sealing the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta. The text highlights that Epstein worked with others to procure minors and that victims' attorneys are petitioning the DOJ to reopen the investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023011.jpg
This document serves as a timeline of events regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case between 2010 and 2015, likely prepared for the House Oversight Committee. It details the release of flight logs implicating high-profile figures, legal battles regarding the violation of victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, Epstein's registration as a Level 3 sex offender in New York, and his subsequent PR attempts to rebrand himself as a philanthropist. The timeline also notes the recruitment of Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015028.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Post news article dated August 26, 2017, discussing the legal efforts to reopen the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein nearly 10 years after his 2008 plea deal. The article details how attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two victims, are arguing that the federal government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of the non-prosecution agreement. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013411.jpg
A May 2010 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reports on a Manhattan federal court hearing where Judge Lawrence M. McKenna took custody of a tape-recorded conversation between reporter George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for Epstein's victims, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, sought the release of the tape to prove Epstein's lack of remorse in civil cases, while Rush's attorneys argued against its release citing reporter's privilege. The judge reserved ruling on whether the 22-minute recording would be released.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021716.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article from August 2011 detailing legal arguments before Judge Kenneth Marra regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement. Attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two Jane Does, argued that the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to confer with victims before signing the deal. The attorneys sought to nullify the agreement and unseal correspondence, aiming to expose Epstein to federal prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021653.jpg
An FBI FD-350 form containing a Palm Beach Post article from April 10, 2009. The article details a new civil lawsuit (the 12th) filed by attorney Robert Josefsberg on behalf of 'Jane Doe 101' against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual abuse of a minor. It also discusses ongoing discovery disputes lead by attorney Adam Horowitz and notes Epstein's incarceration status at the Palm Beach County Stockade.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021551.jpg
A printout of a New York Post 'Page Six' article from July 21, 2008. The article reports that three women suing Jeffrey Epstein are asking US District Judge Kenneth Marra to void Epstein's plea deal with the State of Florida, arguing they were not consulted on the non-prosecution agreement. Epstein's representative, Howard Rubenstein, is quoted denying the allegations and claiming the women were not victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030433.jpg
This editorial from the Sun Sentinel, reprinted in The Virgin Islands Daily News, heavily criticizes the U.S. government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues that the lenient 2007 non-prosecution agreement, brokered by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, was illegal, violated victims' rights, and was shrouded in secrecy to protect Epstein. The article calls on Judge Kenneth Marra to void the agreement, rejecting the Department of Justice's current stance that the deal must stand despite the acknowledged failures.
Reopening investigation
Final written pleas aimed at spurring Judge Marra to force federal officials to reopen the investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity