Professor Cassell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
I
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Testimony of Professor Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Professor Cassell regarding knowledge of allegations against Alan Dershowitz. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Professor Cassell | Deposition Room | View |
| 2010-07-01 | N/A | Settlement terms reached for three clients against Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Favorable settlement terms reached for three clients and Jane Doe in lawsuits against Epstein. | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022164.jpg
This document contains pages 266 and 267 from a book, likely a memoir by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the defense against Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell regarding sexual allegations and Prince Andrew. Page 266 features the narrator attacking the credibility of lawyers Edwards and Cassell. Page 267 (Chapter 67) details the profile of Scott Rothstein, a Fort Lauderdale lawyer running a Ponzi scheme who made large donations to politicians like McCain and Schwarzenegger.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013473.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by an attorney representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the legal strategy regarding RICO and federal claims, specifically the importance of flight logs in establishing a federal nexus via interstate commerce for sexual abuse cases. It also mentions the attorney's departure from the RRA law firm following the exposure of Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and the subsequent settlement of Epstein cases in July 2010.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013499.tif
This document details legal proceedings and events related to Jeffrey Epstein and Scott Rothstein. It describes Jane Doe's RICO and federal claims against Epstein, emphasizing the role of flight logs as evidence of interstate commerce to establish a 'federal nexus' for sexual assaults. It also mentions the affiant's involvement in the Rothstein Ponzi scheme as a victim and their role in reaching settlements in Epstein-related lawsuits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021916.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving Professor Cassell. The witness testifies that Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards contacted a woman in Australia via telephone, who identified Alan Dershowitz as having information regarding Jeffrey Epstein and the sexual abuse of underage girls. During the questioning by Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scarola interrupts to assert that Professor Cassell is entitled to refresh his recollection before moving to a new subject.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021894.jpg
This page is a rough draft transcript from the deposition of Professor Cassell. Attorney Mr. Scarola places an objection on the record regarding Alan Dershowitz's behavior, specifically accusing him of distracting the room by jumping up and excitedly whispering in Mr. Simpson's ear during testimony. Mr. Simpson disagrees with the characterization but agrees to pass notes moving forward.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021878.jpg
Page 55 of a rough draft deposition transcript stamped by House Oversight. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness about what they would have told a judge (specifically Judge Marra). The witness, likely an attorney themselves, objects that the question is speculative and involves attorney-client privilege, but asserts they would have provided an 'ample factual basis for those allegations.' Professor Cassell is mentioned in an objection regarding expert witnesses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021867.jpg
Page 44 of a rough draft deposition transcript involving a witness identified as Professor Cassell. Attorney Mr. Scarola instructs Cassell not to answer questions to preserve the attorney/client privilege of Virginia Roberts. Mr. Simpson questions whether the witness will consistently follow these instructions, to which the witness agrees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021857.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The witness (identified as Professor Cassell) is asked if anyone other than Virginia Roberts had told him, as of December 30, 2014, that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor. The witness denies this. Attorney Mr. Scarola interrupts to clarify the question, asserting that he will not allow the witness to answer regarding information obtained through 'joint representation or common interest privilege' (likely referring to legal team communications), but allows answers regarding outside sources.
Questioning regarding willingness to answer
Simpson asks if the witness will refuse to answer; Scarola instructs witness not to answer based on privilege; Witness confirms he will follow instructions.
Allegations against Dershowitz
The witness denies receiving direct communications from anyone other than Virginia Roberts alleging Dershowitz abused a minor.
Allegations against Dershowitz
The witness denies receiving direct communications from anyone other than Virginia Roberts alleging Dershowitz abused a minor.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity