Burns

Person
Mentions
12
Relationships
2
Events
1
Documents
6
Also known as:
Brian Burns

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Patrick Smith
Business associate
2
2
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2018-12-10 N/A Conference Call Phone/Conference View

073.pdf

A court form from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County dated November 18, 2009, regarding the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein (Case No. 502008CF009381AXXXMB). The document records a status check where a 'Non-Party NP's Motion to Vacate Order Sealing' was denied. Crucially, a handwritten note at the bottom indicates that a 'Defense Motion to Travel' was explicitly denied.

Court order / status check form (palm beach county)
2025-12-26

EFTA00024983.pdf

An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Brian Burns and Patrick Smith. The email attaches a defense response to motions to quash, noting it was filed under seal, and states the prosecution's intent to seek redactions to protect victims' private information.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00018210.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2021 involving the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and outside counsel (Smith Villazor LLP) representing Jordy Feldman. The correspondence concerns an impending Rule 17(c) subpoena related to the *United States v. Maxwell* trial (20 Cr. 330). The government attorneys coordinate with defense counsel regarding the service of the subpoena, noting delays caused by voir dire proceedings in court.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00016484.pdf

This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.

Email thread / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00000525.pdf

This document is an evidence photograph showing a shelf of black three-ring binders labeled with various names, locations, and events spanning roughly 2002-2007. The labels reference Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'), Little St. James ('LSJ'), Zorro Ranch ('Zorro'), and Palm Beach ('PB'), along with associates like Jean Luc Brunel, Walter Cronkite, and possibly Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). Several labels explicitly mention 'girls', 'nudes', 'kids', and 'chix', suggesting the binders contain photographic evidence related to Epstein's trafficking activities.

Evidence photograph (binders)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00005640.jpg

This legal document, page 16 of a filing from October 29, 2021, argues that the proposed expert testimony and 'grooming opinions' of an individual named Roccio should be deemed inadmissible. The author contends that Roccio's testimony is substantially more prejudicial than probative under Rule 403, fails to meet the Daubert standard for scientific reliability, and oversimplifies complex issues, thereby risking misleading the jury. The argument is supported by citations from several court cases, including United States v. Burns and Gonyer, which criticize similar 'grooming theories'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
2
Total
3

RE: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Rule 17(c) subpoena

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Burns

Sending unsigned version of subpoena; noting defense will serve later.

Email
2021-11-17

RE: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Rule 17(c) subpoena

From: Burns
To: [Redacted] (AUSA)

Checking status; haven't been served yet.

Email
2021-11-16

RE: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Rule 17(c) subpoena

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Burns

Noting delay may be due to court voir dire.

Email
2021-11-16

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity