| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Patrick Smith
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-10 | N/A | Conference Call | Phone/Conference | View |
A court form from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County dated November 18, 2009, regarding the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein (Case No. 502008CF009381AXXXMB). The document records a status check where a 'Non-Party NP's Motion to Vacate Order Sealing' was denied. Crucially, a handwritten note at the bottom indicates that a 'Defense Motion to Travel' was explicitly denied.
An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Brian Burns and Patrick Smith. The email attaches a defense response to motions to quash, noting it was filed under seal, and states the prosecution's intent to seek redactions to protect victims' private information.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 involving the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and outside counsel (Smith Villazor LLP) representing Jordy Feldman. The correspondence concerns an impending Rule 17(c) subpoena related to the *United States v. Maxwell* trial (20 Cr. 330). The government attorneys coordinate with defense counsel regarding the service of the subpoena, noting delays caused by voir dire proceedings in court.
This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.
This document is an evidence photograph showing a shelf of black three-ring binders labeled with various names, locations, and events spanning roughly 2002-2007. The labels reference Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'), Little St. James ('LSJ'), Zorro Ranch ('Zorro'), and Palm Beach ('PB'), along with associates like Jean Luc Brunel, Walter Cronkite, and possibly Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). Several labels explicitly mention 'girls', 'nudes', 'kids', and 'chix', suggesting the binders contain photographic evidence related to Epstein's trafficking activities.
This legal document, page 16 of a filing from October 29, 2021, argues that the proposed expert testimony and 'grooming opinions' of an individual named Roccio should be deemed inadmissible. The author contends that Roccio's testimony is substantially more prejudicial than probative under Rule 403, fails to meet the Daubert standard for scientific reliability, and oversimplifies complex issues, thereby risking misleading the jury. The argument is supported by citations from several court cases, including United States v. Burns and Gonyer, which criticize similar 'grooming theories'.
Sending unsigned version of subpoena; noting defense will serve later.
Checking status; haven't been served yet.
Noting delay may be due to court voir dire.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity