| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unknown author
|
Cited reference |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Berntson
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Aquinas
|
Scholarly reference |
5
|
1 |
This document appears to be a page from an academic or philosophical report included in House Oversight evidence. It discusses the formation and methodology of a 'network' of scholars dedicated to bridging the gap between science and religion/philosophy. The text references scholars Berntson and Browning, discussing the integration of scientific methods with theological or philosophical inquiry.
This document is page 142 of a larger file, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021388, likely part of a Congressional investigation. The text appears to be an excerpt from an academic or philosophical work discussing medical ethics, the limitations of science in determining moral goals, and the influence of religious frameworks on medical decisions (citing controversial topics like abortion and assisted suicide). It references a scholar named 'Browning' regarding religious humanism.
This document page (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021387) appears to be an excerpt from an academic text discussing the evolutionary and theological rationales for medicine. It contrasts the concept of 'inclusive fitness' and eugenics (citing Francis Galton and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' support for sterilization) with the medical and religious imperative to care for the sick regardless of their genetic fitness or reproductive capacity. It draws on Christian theology (Aquinas) to explain altruism beyond kinship.
This document is the title page for a book titled 'Invisible Forces and Powerful Beliefs: Gravity, Gods, and Minds,' authored by the Chicago Social Brain Network and published by FT Press. The page features a word cloud containing the names of various academic contributors (including Cacioppo, Luhrmann, and Epley) and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely regarding scientific funding or academic connections relevant to the Epstein inquiry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity