PAE
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Discussion topic |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-25 | N/A | Call with PAE regarding Epstein | Unknown | View |
| 2020-04-29 | N/A | Order in United States v. Rivera | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Order in United States v. Andrews | S.D.N.Y. | View |
EFTA00029975.pdf
Internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 17, 2020, coordinating 'Production 7' of discovery materials for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence details the preparation of encrypted drives from PAE and iPhone images, including a table of Bates ranges (SDNY_GM_00536837 to SDNY_GM_02742043) primarily labeled as 'Search Warrant Returns'. The emails mention a specific password for a drive (WO-6290_20201104) and discuss logistics for providing copies to both the defense counsel and the defendant.
EFTA00029063.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They discuss seeking and subsequently obtaining a one-week extension from the Court (Judge PAE) for a FOIA disclosure related to 'Noel/Thomas' (referring to the deferred prosecution agreements of Epstein guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas). The extension was requested to review recently completed interviews to ensure the guards met the requirements of their agreements; the plaintiff ('The Times') consented to the delay.
EFTA00027716.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry from March 25, 2021, for a 30-minute call titled 'Call with PAE re Epstein'. The organizer and attendees are redacted, but the event is classified as 'X-PERSONAL' and includes dial-in instructions. The document appears to be part of a discovery production (Bates stamp EFTA00027716), likely related to post-mortem litigation or investigations concerning Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00027714.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry from March 25, 2021, detailing an accepted call 'with PAE re Epstein'. The call was scheduled for 30 minutes and classified as 'Personal'. The attendee's identity and the dial-in details are redacted, but the date suggests post-mortem discussions regarding the Epstein estate or related legal matters.
EFTA00027395.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between an Assistant US Attorney (USANYS) and an external reviewer regarding a deadline for 'Tartaglione redactions' in Epstein FOIA documents. The US Attorney presses for the review to be completed to allow the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to meet a Friday deadline, noting that requesting an extension from Judge 'PAE' (Paul A. Engelmayer) would be difficult and require the consent of The New York Times. The reviewer indicates they are behind schedule but will attempt to finish by the deadline.
EFTA00026928.pdf
An email dated April 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney regarding the 'Epstein FOIA' case (specifically Times v. BOP, case 20cv833). The sender circulates a draft letter to Judge Engelmayer concerning 'Noel' and next steps in the litigation ahead of a scheduled 10:00 call.
EFTA00024025.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 17, 2021, with the subject line 'Jeffrey Epstein FOIA cases - time sensitive ISO'. The sender is inquiring about FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) cases related to Epstein and notes they already have a case before 'PAE' (likely referencing a judge or official). The names of the senders and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00024012.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry for a tentative call scheduled for March 25, 2021, regarding 'Epstein'. The call involves a party identified as 'PAE' and a redacted attendee. The entry includes dial-in details and indicates the classification is 'X-PERSONAL'. The date (2021) suggests this pertains to post-mortem legal proceedings or estate management rather than direct interaction with Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00024011.pdf
This document is an email or calendar invitation header dated March 25, 2021. The sender and recipient are redacted. The subject line indicates a tentative call was being scheduled with 'PAE' regarding 'Epstein'. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00024011.
EFTA00021893.pdf
This document is an email chain spanning from late July to early August 2020, primarily discussing the status of evidence related to the 'Epstein Evidence status' and 'new materials for Maxwell upload to Relativity'. The conversations revolve around the delivery, receipt, and processing of various digital materials, including thumb drives and hard drives, addressing missing items, duplicate folders, zero-byte files, and challenges with data recovery from physically failed drives. Participants are coordinating the transfer and review of these materials for eventual upload to the Relativity platform.
EFTA00019488.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry dated March 25, 2021, for a tentative 30-minute call titled 'Call with PAE re Epstein.' The call is classified as 'X-PERSONAL.' The document includes metadata such as creation and modification timestamps, but the dial-in details and the identity of the attendee (name and email) have been redacted. The date indicates this communication occurred well after Jeffrey Epstein's death, likely pertaining to legal or estate matters.
DOJ-OGR-00015123.jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 6, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). Attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger of the firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. are formally requesting a court order to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014914.jpg
This is page 38 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. The witness, Rocchio, is testifying on direct examination about their professional methodology for forensic evaluations, which includes reviewing police and medical records, conducting 8-10 hours of face-to-face evaluation, and collateral interviews. The witness specifically confirms experience evaluating issues of 'grooming' in civil cases involving allegations of childhood sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00008639.jpg
This document is page 101 of the jury instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text, labeled Instruction No. 12, defines the legal distinction between 'Conspiracy Counts' (agreement to commit a crime) and 'Substantive Counts' (actual commission of a crime), instructing the jury that these are separate offenses and outlining the order in which specific counts (One through Six) will be addressed.
DOJ-OGR-00008628.jpg
This document is Page 90 of 167 from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains 'Instruction No. 3', which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case via any electronic means or social media (listing specific platforms like Facebook and Twitter) and bans outside research. The instruction emphasizes that deliberations must occur only within the jury room and verdicts must be based solely on evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00008624.jpg
This document is page 86 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains a table of contents for Jury Instructions 24 through 48, outlining legal parameters for charges including Sex Trafficking of a Minor, Conspiracy to Violate Federal Laws, Aiding and Abetting, and procedural instructions regarding witness credibility and evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008565.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court filing (Document 563) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains jury instructions regarding Count Two, specifically addressing the Violation of New York Criminal Law (Penal Law Section 130.55) concerning Sexual Abuse in the Third Degree. The text defines sexual contact and consent, emphasizing that individuals under seventeen are legally incapable of consent, and instructs that for a conviction based on age, the jury must find Maxwell knew 'Jane' was under seventeen.
DOJ-OGR-00013277.jpg
This document is the final page (264) of a court transcript index from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists various exhibit numbers (e.g., 325, 418, 420B) and the corresponding transcript page numbers where they were received. The document was filed on August 10, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00009122.jpg
This document is the Preliminary Statement from a legal memorandum filed by the US Government on February 24, 2022, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The Government argues that Maxwell has not met the heavy burden required to prove that a juror deliberately lied during voir dire or that the juror would have been struck for cause, citing legal precedents such as McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood. The filing requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion based on the present record.
DOJ-OGR-00009108.jpg
This document is the title page of an Amicus Curiae Brief filed on February 24, 2022, by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-CR-330) in the Southern District of New York. The filing attorneys listed are Abbe David Lowell and Christopher D. Man of Winston & Strawn LLP, and Joel B. Rudin of the Law Offices of Joel B. Rudin, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00009094.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. It is a blank supplemental answer sheet for Juror ID 50, likely part of a juror questionnaire, instructing the juror on how to provide answers that did not fit in the provided spaces. The page is also marked with a Department of Justice identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00009008.jpg
This document is page 7 (marked 'vii') of a 66-page court filing, specifically Document 613 filed on February 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page contains a Table of Authorities listing citations for the 6th Amendment and various Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure referenced elsewhere in the brief.
DOJ-OGR-00008980.jpg
This document is the cover page for a Memorandum of Law filed on February 24, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It was filed by attorney Todd Spodek on behalf of 'Juror 50', who is seeking to intervene in the case to release a sealed jury questionnaire and transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00010688.jpg
This document is page 26 of a legal filing, Document 674, from criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 24, 2022. The page consists of a single black-and-white photograph showing a human foot with surgical staples, likely submitted as evidence. The document is marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
Tentative: Call with PAE re Epstein
Scheduled call regarding Epstein. Duration: 30 minutes (20:30:00 to 21:00:00 UTC).
Tentative: Call with PAE re Epstein
Scheduled call details with dial-in information.
Accepted: Call with PAE re Epstein
Calendar entry for a 30-minute call classified as X-PERSONAL. Dial-in details provided.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity