Guerrero
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Crime | A decade-long conspiracy of sexual abuse and federal sex-trafficking, which the government charge... | N/A | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Legal proceeding | The case United States v. Guerrero, 910 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2018) was decided. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Legal case | The legal case United States v. Guerrero, 910 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2018) is cited. | N/A | View |
| 2012-01-01 | Legal ruling | The 9th Circuit Court ruled in United States v. Guerrero, finding no jurisdiction over a defendan... | 9th Cir. | View |
| 2012-01-01 | Court ruling | A court ruling was issued in the case of United States v. Guerrero. | 9th Cir. | View |
| 2004-01-01 | Crime | A decade-long conspiracy of sexual abuse and federal sex-trafficking offense, which the governmen... | N/A | View |
EFTA00035056.pdf
This document is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York dated August 2, 2019, covering activities from August 1, 2019. It highlights significant security concerns, specifically unsecured food slots in Unit 5-South due to tampering or malfunction, which posed a 'grave safety and security risk' aggravated by severe staff shortages. The report also details inmate movements, including admissions, releases, and placements into the Special Housing Unit (SHU), and notes one redacted inmate (likely Jeffrey Epstein based on context/timeline) on psychological observation with an inmate companion.
DOJ-OGR-00014784.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding, filed on August 22, 2022, discussing the sentencing of a defendant for a conspiracy of sexual abuse. The central issue is determining whether the 2003 or the harsher 2004 sentencing guidelines apply, which hinges on whether the crime continued past November 1, 2004. The government's argument relies on the testimony of a victim named Carolyn, whom the judge and jury found to be a credible witness.
DOJ-OGR-00021582.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge discusses the sentencing guidelines applicable to the defendant, Guerrero. The central issue is determining whether the offense, a conspiracy of sexual abuse involving a victim named Carolyn, continued past November 1, 2004, which would trigger harsher 2004 guidelines. The judge states that both they and the jury found Carolyn to be a credible witness, whose testimony is being used to establish the timeline of the crime.
DOJ-OGR-00019630.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against an immediate appeal by a party named Maxwell regarding the use of criminal discovery materials. It contends that Maxwell has not met the legal standard for such a review, citing precedents like Flanagan, Martoma, and Guerrero. The document asserts that Maxwell's concerns about privacy and publicity can be adequately addressed during a standard appeal after a final judgment is rendered in her criminal case.
DOJ-OGR-00019612.jpg
This document appears to be page 5 (labeled Roman numeral iv) of a legal brief or filing related to Case 20-3061, filed on October 2, 2020. It is a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (case law) cited in the main document, including United States v. Caparros and United States v. Kerik. The footer indicates it is part of a Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR) release.
DOJ-OGR-00019357.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing arguing against an interlocutory appeal sought by a party named Maxwell. The author contends that Maxwell's reasons for appeal, related to pretrial discovery and the potential unsealing of documents, do not meet the high legal threshold for an appeal before a final judgment. The document cites several legal precedents, including cases like *United States v. Martoma* and *United States v. Guerrero*, to support its position that the issues are not significant enough to warrant immediate review.
DOJ-OGR-00011556.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding concerning the sentencing of a defendant named Guerrero for a sex-trafficking conspiracy. The judge is determining whether the 2003 or the harsher 2004 sentencing guidelines apply, which hinges on whether the crime continued after November 1, 2004. This determination relies heavily on the testimony of a victim named Carolyn, whom the judge and jury found to be a credible witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity