An email thread from November 6, 2019, involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP regarding the case Doe v. Indyke, et al. (1:19-cv-08673-KPF). Associate Kyla Magun writes to Judge Failla to submit a courtesy copy of a response letter filed by Roberta Kaplan on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe, countering letters filed by the defendants the previous night.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between the administrators of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Jordy Feldman) and legal counsel for the victims (Roberta Kaplan's firm). The correspondence centers on the victims' counsel challenging the independence of the program, arguing that because the administrators were hired and paid by the Epstein Estate, they cannot be neutral. Kaplan's team proposes adding a fourth administrator selected by the plaintiffs to ensure fairness.
An email chain from December 2019 involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink, Troutman Sanders, and Boies Schiller Flexner regarding The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence involves the forwarding of attached letters between counsel, with Roberta Kaplan forwarding the thread to an undisclosed recipient noting, 'I assume you have this.' The thread indicates ongoing legal coordination or dispute resolution concerning the Epstein Estate.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity