Wong
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Co witnesses |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00003062.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a government brief, arguing against a defendant's claim of Fifth Amendment privilege. It cites numerous court cases (such as Boyd, Fisher, and Bryson) to establish that the act of production privilege for private papers has been limited and that the Fifth Amendment does not protect an individual from prosecution for perjury, even if testimony was improperly compelled. The core argument is that a citizen cannot lie to the government with impunity.
DOJ-OGR-00002959.jpg
This document is page xxiv of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal case citations with corresponding page numbers where they are referenced within the larger document. The majority of the cases listed involve the United States as a party against various individuals and one corporation.
DOJ-OGR-00004792.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 307) from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 25, 2021. The text argues against Maxwell's attempt to suppress deposition transcripts from a civil case, citing legal precedents (Oshatz, Wong, Knox) to establish that even if a protective order was modified, the testimony can be used, particularly in a perjury trial where the statements themselves are the crime. The government asserts that civil deposition testimony does not violate rights against self-incrimination in this context.
DOJ-OGR-00014680.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between Judge Nathan and counsel (Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim) regarding a scheduling note to be sent to the deliberating jury about December 23rd. Subsequently, the jury sends a note requesting testimony transcripts for witnesses identified as Jane, Wong, and Kate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020577.jpg
This document is page 118 of a House Oversight Committee report detailing the influence of the Chinese government on American technology and travel corporations. It highlights how companies like Google, Facebook, and Marriott have navigated Chinese censorship demands, 'cyber-sovereignty,' and political pressure regarding the status of Taiwan and Tibet to maintain market access. Although this document comes from a batch potentially labeled as 'Epstein-related' by the user, the text itself contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; it focuses exclusively on US-China corporate and geopolitical relations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013787.jpg
This document page appears to be a bibliography or reference section from a scientific paper or report, specifically page 287. It lists various academic publications related to physics, mathematics, chaos theory, and random processes, ranging from 1949 to 1996. A prominent author listed is M.F. Shlesinger. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity