| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense Counsel (Garden City)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | N/A | Meeting between defense counsel (Barket) and US Attorney's office to discuss briefing schedule. | Not specified | View |
This document is an email chain from August 20-22, 2020, involving defense attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns a letter regarding 'jail conditions and court appearance,' specifically citing 'COVID stuff at MCC' (Metropolitan Correctional Center). The USANYS staff discusses coordinating a response to Judge Karas by the following Monday.
This document is an email chain from August 20-21, 2020, involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP and the US Attorney's Office (Narcotics Unit). The subject concerns a 'Letter regarding jail conditions and court appearance' and a 'Continued Inhumane Prison' attachment sent to Judge Karas. The USANYS Co-Chief of the Narcotics Unit requests an urgent call to discuss the matter, citing a Monday deadline.
This document is an email chain from August 2, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Defense Counsel regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The correspondence details a dispute over whether specific discovery materials, including statements to law enforcement and cell site data, should be filed under seal or publicly with redactions. The prosecution accuses the defense of violating a protective order by publicly filing sensitive exhibits, while the defense discusses logistical issues regarding getting the defendant's affidavit signed at the MCC without the legal team acting as witnesses.
This document is an email dated September 20, 2019, from attorney Bruce A. Barket to redacted recipients, copied to Tony Ricco and Michael Bachrach. The email discusses setting up a meeting to propose a briefing schedule, aiming to finalize their schedule by the following Tuesday. The document includes a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer and Bates number EFTA00021330.
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. Attorney Bruce Barket writes to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) asserting that his client, Mr. Tartaglione (presumably Epstein's cellmate), must not be questioned regarding Epstein's suicide or the associated FBI/IG investigations without counsel present. Assistant US Attorney Maurene responds, noting that she and 'Jason' are not handling the death investigation but will forward the request to the appropriate prosecutors.
This document is an email chain from September 20-21, 2019, primarily involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP, and an Assistant United States Attorney. The discussion concerns scheduling a meeting to propose a briefing schedule. The AUSA suggests meeting 'next Friday' to allow time for internal discussion and conferring with a redacted party.
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Michael Bachrach and Bruce Barket) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The attorneys are requesting records of statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's reported suicide attempt on July 22-23, 2019. The defense argues this is 'Rule 16' discovery material relevant to a 'penalty phase' (likely Tartaglione's capital case), while the government discusses the procedural requirements (Touhy regulations vs. Rule 16).
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), the Chambers of Judge Karas (NYSD), and defense attorney Bruce Barket of the firm Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP. The correspondence concerns the submission of letters regarding jail conditions (specifically at the MCC) and court appearances pursuant to a court order. The emails indicate coordination between the defense, the prosecution (Narcotics Unit), and the Judge regarding filings and memo endorsements.
Requesting that the inquiry regarding Mr. Tartaglione's statements be considered a Rule 16 request for the penalty phase.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity