This legal document argues that the photo identification of a defendant by 'Minor Victim-4' was valid and not suggestive. It establishes that the victim had prior personal knowledge of the defendant from interactions between 2001 and 2004, and that the photo identification procedure was conducted cautiously. The document refutes the defense's claim that the defendant's photo was unduly suggestive because it looked like a 'mug shot' or was different from the others.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity