CFI
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Fonda (subject)
|
Featured speaker guest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Board member |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawrence Krauss
|
Professional honorary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawrence Krauss
|
Honorary director speaker |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12-01 | N/A | Recipient made honorary member of CFI's board of directors. | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019463.jpg
This document is page 16 of a report by CEFOTAJ (Centre De Formation Technique Pour L'Avancement Des Jeunes Du Sud'Est Inc.), containing an 'Appendix' of bibliographic references. The citations, retrieved mostly in November 2010, focus heavily on business opportunities, economic recovery, and investment in Haiti following the 2010 earthquake. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019456.jpg
This document is page 9 of a strategic report or business plan for CEFOTAJ, focusing on establishing a couture/textile assembly industry in Haiti. It presents a SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) evaluating the Haitian market, citing sources from 2006 to 2010. The analysis highlights the low cost of production and skilled workforce as strengths, while noting corruption, infrastructure issues, and political instability as threats.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019453.jpg
This document is page 6 of a report produced by CEFOTAJ, a non-profit organization. It details the geopolitical and economic relationship between the U.S. and Haiti, outlining significant financial aid contributions from the U.S. and World Bank donors between 1995 and 2008. The text analyzes Haiti's economic struggles prior to the 2010 earthquake, citing political instability and corruption, while also noting the country's openness to foreign banking and investment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019452.jpg
A country profile background document for Haiti produced by the organization CEFOTAJ. It details the geographical, demographic, and macroeconomic situation of Haiti, citing data from 2008-2010 regarding poverty levels, exports, imports, and international agreements. The document includes contact information for CEFOTAJ in Brentwood, NY.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031435.jpg
The author responds to a series of complaints and allegations regarding their conduct, specifically denying harassment claims and providing context for interactions with students and colleagues. The document details defenses against specific items (1 through 6), explains professional relationships at Case Western and ASU, and asserts that the author's integrity is validated by their continued employment and invitations to speak at organizations like CFI.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020602.jpg
This document is an appendix page (Appendix 1, page 143) from a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020602). It serves as a glossary or acronym list defining various Chinese government, political, military, and media organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026773.jpg
This document outlines a series of sexual misconduct allegations ('Incident 5' and 'Incident 6') against an unnamed subject (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss via context). The allegations include inappropriate touching at the 2011 American Atheists Convention, propositioning a guest on a 2011 CFI cruise, and groping a woman during a selfie at the 2016 Australian Skeptics National Convention. The document notes that while formal complaints were filed with ASU and ANU, both universities stated they found insufficient evidence or no policy violations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026771.jpg
This document contains an email exchange between BuzzFeed News reporter Peter Aldhous and Dr. Lawrence Krauss regarding an upcoming story about sexual misconduct allegations spanning 2006-2016. The email details specific allegations, including an incident in November 2006 in Washington D.C. involving a volunteer, and solicits a response from Krauss before publication. The top portion of the document shows a partial response from Krauss defending his interactions with fans and students.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026768.jpg
This document is an email chain from December 11, 2017, in which physicist Lawrence Krauss forwards his response to a BuzzFeed News inquiry regarding sexual harassment allegations to Sam Harris and Travis Pangburn. In the forwarded message to reporter Peter Aldhous, Krauss categorically denies the allegations, stating 'I do not sexually harass people,' and claims the upcoming story is an attempt to smear him and potentially other atheists. Krauss cites his good standing with universities and the Center for Inquiry (CFI) as evidence of his proper conduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021431.jpg
This document outlines allegations of sexual misconduct against Lawrence Krauss (referred to as 'you'), specifically detailing an incident at the Melbourne Zoo in November 2016 where he allegedly grabbed a woman's breast. It notes that while formal complaints were filed with ASU and ANU, both universities cleared him of policy violations due to insufficient evidence. The document also lists biographical details about Krauss, including his involvement with the Origins Project and his professional relationship with Richard Dawkins.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021429.jpg
This document is a formal request for comment from journalists (including Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes) to a prominent physics professor (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss by the biographical details) regarding an upcoming story on sexual misconduct allegations. The text details specific incidents of alleged assault and harassment occurring between 2006 and 2007 at the Center for Inquiry in D.C. and Case Western Reserve University. The document is stamped with a House Oversight footer, indicating it is part of an investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to academia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021428.jpg
This document contains a detailed rebuttal, likely written by Dr. Lawrence Krauss, addressing sexual harassment allegations investigated by BuzzFeed News reporter Peter Aldhous. The text discusses specific investigations by Arizona State University (ASU) and Australian National University (ANU) regarding a 'selfie' incident in November 2016, where a third party alleged Krauss touched a woman's breast; Krauss denies the claim, citing university reports that found no evidence of physical contact. The document includes a forwarded email from Aldhous dated December 10, 2017, requesting an interview.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021427.jpg
This document is an email from Lawrence Krauss dated December 10, 2017, containing a 'First draft' response to a series of sexual harassment allegations posed by a reporter. Krauss denies the allegations, specifically addressing incidents involving a consensual encounter in 2006, interaction with a student interested in science communication, and an incident where his wife was misidentified as a 'female companion.' The document appears to be part of a House Oversight investigation file.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021423.jpg
This document appears to be a fact-checking email or request for comment sent by journalist Peter Aldhous to physicist Lawrence Krauss (implied). It outlines Krauss's public profile and confronts him with specific controversies, primarily his defense of Jeffrey Epstein and financial ties to Epstein's foundation (specifically a $100,000 pledge to the Origins Project). It also references past allegations of misconduct against Krauss mentioned in blog posts from 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021420.jpg
An email from BuzzFeed News reporter Peter Aldhous to physicist Dr. Lawrence Krauss, dated December 10, 2017, notifying him of an upcoming story regarding sexual misconduct allegations spanning 2006-2016. The email details a specific 2006 incident in Washington D.C. involving a volunteer for the Center for Inquiry, alleging Krauss invited her to his hotel room and forcibly assaulted her. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021417.jpg
This document is a detailed rebuttal written by a high-profile scientist/professor (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss by context) responding to a list of sexual harassment allegations provided by a reporter or investigator. The author systematically denies or clarifies six specific items, including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual/platonic, and a 2008 complaint by a student at Case Western Reserve University which he argues was informal and resolved. He also references investigations by ASU and ANU which he claims cleared him of wrongdoing regarding third-party anonymous complaints.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021415.jpg
This document is a request for comment from journalist Peter Aldhous to an unnamed scientist (identifiable by context as Lawrence Krauss) regarding their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. It details specific instances where the recipient defended Epstein, received $100,000 in funding for their Origins Project, and was the subject of blog posts alleging misconduct. The document highlights the recipient's public statements supporting Epstein despite his 2008 conviction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021413.jpg
This document outlines a series of sexual harassment allegations and incidents involving Dr. Lawrence Krauss (referred to as 'you'). It details a formal investigation at Case Western Reserve University in 2008 that resulted in restrictions on his access to campus, followed by subsequent allegations of inappropriate behavior at atheist conventions and on a CFI cruise between 2008 and 2011. The document appears to be an investigative summary produced by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021412.jpg
This document is a formal request for comment from journalists (likely BuzzFeed News) to a prominent physicist (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss by biographical details) regarding allegations of sexual misconduct spanning 2006 to 2016. It details two specific incidents: a 2006 alleged sexual assault of a volunteer at a Center for Inquiry event in Washington D.C., and a 2007 pattern of harassment toward a student at Case Western Reserve University. The document originates from a House Oversight committee file dump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021411.jpg
This document is an email chain between BuzzFeed News reporter Peter Aldhous and physicist Dr. Lawrence Krauss regarding allegations of sexual harassment. Aldhous challenges Krauss's previous assertion that university investigations (by ASU and ANU) found the claims to be fabricated. In the response (top half), Krauss defends himself, detailing that the complaints were anonymous, that the alleged victim never complained, and that the universities cleared him of wrongdoing regarding a specific 'selfie' incident in November 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021410.jpg
This document is a draft email written by Lawrence Krauss on December 10, 2017, responding to a reporter or investigator regarding multiple allegations of sexual harassment. Krauss categorically denies the allegations, offering specific rebuttals to numbered 'items,' including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual and stopped politely, and a complaint by a former student at Case Western Reserve University which he claims was resolved informally with no finding of harassment. He argues that his high profile invites scrutiny but asserts his behavior has always been professional.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021409.jpg
This document is a detailed rebuttal, likely written by physicist Lawrence Krauss (based on the specific career trajectory and allegations mentioned), addressing two specific complaints of misconduct ('Item 2' and 'Item 6'). The author defends his interactions with a female student at Case Western Reserve University, stating their relationship was professional and mentorship-focused. He also addresses an allegation regarding a 'selfie' taken in November 2016 at an ANU-related event, citing an internal investigation that found the allegations not credible and noting the alleged victim never filed a complaint. The document appears to be part of a larger submission to the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity