Dave Aronberg
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-01 | Legal proceeding | An Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration was issued by the 15th Circuit. | 15th Cir. | View |
| 2024-07-01 | N/A | Order in CA Florida Holdings case cited in the text. | Florida (15th Circuit) | View |
| 2024-02-29 | Legal proceeding | A Trial Court's Order was issued in the case of CA Florida Holdings, LLC v. Dave Aronberg and Jos... | 15th Cir. | View |
| 2021-01-20 | N/A | Dave Aronberg leaves a voicemail for the email sender. | N/A | View |
061.pdf
This document is a motion filed on July 18, 2025, by U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche, requesting the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein. The motion follows a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum that concluded a review of Epstein's case found no evidence to predicate investigations into uncharged third parties. Citing significant public interest and historical importance, the government argues for transparency while ensuring victim identities remain redacted.
EFTA00025014.pdf
This document is an email dated January 21, 2021, forwarding a voicemail notification. The sender informs a redacted recipient that Florida State Attorney Dave Aronberg left a message, likely regarding the 'Epstein case' or potentially 'WBTW'. The sender seeks guidance on whether the recipient wishes to speak with Aronberg directly.
DOJ-OGR-00015094.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing submitted on August 5, 2025, by the defense firm Markus/Moss in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts, distinguishing Maxwell's case from *In re Biaggi* and rejecting a Florida public records case as irrelevant to federal Rule 6(e) protections. The defense concludes that there is no precedent for unsealing such transcripts in an ongoing matter and requests the motion be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00015039.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of a court filing from July 18, 2025, argues for the release of grand jury records related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It cites multiple legal precedents to establish that while grand jury proceedings are traditionally secret, this secrecy is not absolute and can be overridden in 'special circumstances' of significant public and historical interest. The document asserts that the Epstein matter, involving 'the most infamous pedophile in American history,' qualifies as such a circumstance, making the grand jury records 'critical pieces' of national history that should be made public.
Voice Message
Voicemail left at 4:24:29 PM EST.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity