This document is a heavily redacted version of Jeffrey Epstein's 'Black Book' (contact list) from approximately 2004-2005. It contains an alphabetical listing of high-profile individuals, politicians, celebrities, and business associates, along with sections for specific locations (Palm Beach, NY, Paris, etc.) and services (Massage, Medical, Aviation). The final page contains significant handwritten notes identifying key witnesses, staff members (chefs, drivers), and specific allegations regarding the procurement of women ('Scout for young females') and interactions with underage girls.
An October 2020 email chain involving an FBI Special Agent in Boston forwarding a message from an academic/journalist. The inner email discusses Alan Dershowitz's request for Harvard to investigate his connections to Epstein for exoneration purposes, notes the resignation of Ghislaine Maxwell's husband (Scott Bergerson/Borgerson) from a tech startup, and speculates on the unsealing of Maxwell's deposition revealing more about MIT and Harvard faculty activities.
This document is an email from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) circulating a Rolling Stone article from July 2019 detailing Ghislaine Maxwell's background and connection to Jeffrey Epstein following his arrest. The article outlines her history as Robert Maxwell's daughter, her role in New York society, and specific allegations from victims (names redacted) regarding her role in procuring underage girls for Epstein and facilitating abuse involving figures like Alan Dershowitz. It mentions her presence at Mar-a-Lago and Chelsea Clinton's wedding, as well as her denial of all allegations.
This document is a discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 4, 2021. It lists produced materials including FBI recovered metadata, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a letter from 1995 related to Oxford. The letter also clarifies new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
This document appears to be a heavily redacted address book or contact list associated with Jeffrey Epstein. It spans from 2004-2005 and contains an alphabetical listing of names, organizations, and businesses, along with sections for specific locations like "France", "Israel", "Kenya", and categories like "Massage", "Medical", and "Travel". The document includes handwritten notes identifying key individuals, witnesses, and staff members, such as Ghislaine Maxwell, chefs, pilots, and drivers.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. Kate confirms that at the time she met Ghislaine and Epstein, she was an international model. She states she met Ghislaine in Paris while traveling with an older man she was dating, who she learned was an Oxford classmate of Ghislaine.
This document is a transcript of the opening statement by Ms. Sternheim, the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that while four women will testify against Maxwell, the evidence will not support the charges. She portrays Maxwell as an accomplished and educated woman, urging the jury not to be biased by her privileged lifestyle, and introduces Jeffrey Epstein as a successful and philanthropic man whom Maxwell met in the 1990s.
This image is a U.S. Department of Justice photograph, labeled as Government Exhibit 256 from the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). It depicts a desk laden with office equipment and papers, including several notepads personalized with the name "Jeffrey E. Epstein," strongly suggesting the desk belongs to him. The contents provide a glimpse into an office environment, but most of the documents are illegible.
This document is a page from a character reference letter filed in court on June 15, 2022, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell prior to her sentencing. The anonymous author, a family friend of over 60 years, describes the difficult upbringing of the Maxwell children under their 'narcissistic' father, Robert Maxwell, and highlights Ghislaine's intelligence and work ethic at Oxford. The letter appeals to the judge for leniency, noting Ghislaine's regret over meeting Jeffrey Epstein and the harsh conditions she has endured in jail, including sleep deprivation.
This document is a page from a government legal filing (Document 204) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes excerpts from Maxwell's deposition where she denies interacting with anyone under 18 at Epstein's properties, other than Virginia [Giuffre]. The filing argues against the defense's motion to dismiss perjury charges based on ambiguity, asserting that terms like 'Jeffrey,' 'properties,' and 'interact' were clear in context.
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding a witness named 'Kate'. The text characterizes Kate as an ambitious former actress and model who maintained a decade-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, including sending him emails and photos while he was incarcerated. The defense argues Kate was above the age of consent in all relevant jurisdictions (UK, NY, FL) and implies her testimony may be unreliable due to admitted drug use.
This document is a page from a defense attorney's (Ms. Menninger) summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues that the government failed to prove its case, specifically challenging the narrative that Maxwell targeted and recruited young women. The defense points to testimony indicating that other individuals, such as Virginia Roberts and Maria Farmer, were responsible for introducing victims like Carolyn and Annie Farmer to Jeffrey Epstein, not Maxwell.
This document is a page from an academic syllabus or reading list, likely for an advanced economics course, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019402. It lists various academic papers, books, and working papers related to macroeconomics, banking crises, oil, and the Eurozone, with dates ranging primarily from 2003 to April 2009. Prominent economist Kenneth Rogoff, a known associate in the Epstein files, is listed as an editor and co-author on multiple entries.
This document is a page from a House Oversight file (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031909) containing a reprint of a Project Syndicate article titled 'Does Anything Matter?' by philosopher Peter Singer, dated June 13, 2011. The text discusses moral philosophy, specifically the debate between subjective and objective ethics, and highlights the recent publication of Derek Parfit's book 'On What Matters' as a significant event in secular philosophy.
This document, stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020658, is a biographical list titled 'International Associates' found in the 'About the Participants' section of a larger report. It details the academic and diplomatic credentials of ten individuals, predominantly experts in Asian, Chinese, and European foreign relations, affiliated with institutions such as the Hoover Institution, Oxford, and the Woodrow Wilson Center.
The document is a page from a participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It contains a roster of approximately 43 individuals sorted alphabetically (names starting with H), detailing their names, job titles, affiliated organizations, and countries of origin. The document bears the bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017079, indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document is a page from an attendee list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in 2011, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017078. It lists approximately 48 high-profile individuals, including CEOs, politicians, and academics, along with their titles, organizations, and countries of origin. Notable names include Richard Haass (Council on Foreign Relations), Poppy Harlow (CNN), and Antonio Guterres (UN).
This document is a page from a participant directory for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile individuals from various sectors including finance (Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, UniCredit), media (Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters), academia (Harvard, MIT, Oxford), and government. The document contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017076' stamp, indicating it is part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to inquiries regarding Jeffrey Epstein's associations, though Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
This document is a page from the attendee list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile participants including Bill and Melinda Gates, Timothy Geithner (then US Treasury Secretary), and Thomas Friedman (NYT), categorized by name, title, organization, and country. The document bears the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017075', indicating it was part of a US House Oversight Committee document production.
This document is a page from a participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It contains a roster of high-profile individuals arranged alphabetically by surname (from Chin to Colondam), including their job titles, organizations, and countries of origin. Notable figures on this page include former US President William J. Clinton, UK Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, author Paulo Coelho, and various prominent CEOs and financial executives such as Steven A. Cohen and Gary D. Cohn. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017068.
This document is page 16 of a scientific or academic paper regarding quantitative linguistics, specifically the 'Estimation of Lexicon Size.' It details a methodology for analyzing word frequency (1-grams) over time (1900-2000) using the Oxford English Dictionary and other sources. The text explains a classification system for filtering words (e.g., typos, proper nouns, foreign words) to estimate the size of the English lexicon. While the content is purely academic, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017024' indicates this document was collected as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to the broader Epstein document production.
This document is a page containing scientific figures (Panels A-G) analyzing English language evolution, word frequency, and verb regularization (e.g., 'burnt' vs 'burned') over time (1800-2000). It compares data from dictionaries like the OED and Merriam-Webster and contrasts US and UK usage trends. While the content is linguistic data, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017004' indicates this page was processed as part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is 'Page 2' of a scientific paper titled 'Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books' (inferred from context/DOI) published in Science/Sciencexpress on December 16, 2010. It discusses 'culturomics,' the size of the English lexicon, and compares word usage frequency against standard dictionaries like Webster's and OED. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation (potentially related to Epstein or financial oversight), the content itself is purely academic and contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or criminal activity.
This document contains page 85 of a scientific or philosophical essay titled 'Beyond Reward and Punishment' by physicist David Deutsch. The text discusses human evolution, the nature of knowledge, imitation, and creativity, referencing Karl Popper. It appears to be part of a larger collection of essays (likely an Edge.org Annual Question response, given Epstein's known funding of Edge). The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016888', indicating it was produced during a Congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a narrative or report (stamped by House Oversight) profiling physicist Max Tegmark. It details his founding of the Future of Life Institute (FLI) with Jaan Tallinn, lists high-profile scientific advisory board members like Elon Musk and Nick Bostrom, and discusses FLI's conferences in Puerto Rico and Asilomar regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) safety.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity