U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York charged Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-02 | Legal action | The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York obtained a federal grand jury in... | New York | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Investigation | The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York opened its investigation into Je... | Southern District of New York | View |
EFTA00038014.pdf
This document contains an email chain and a formal letter from the FBI Victim Services Division dated September and October 2019, inviting victims of Jeffrey Epstein to informational briefings. The FBI scheduled meetings in Miramar, Florida (Oct 15) and New York City (Oct 23) to discuss victim services, noting that specific details of the active investigation (Case NY-3027571) would not be shared. One redacted victim responded via email confirming their attendance at the Miami location and indicating they would be accompanied by another victim.
EFTA00031974.pdf
This document is an email chain dated May 10, 2019, originating from a Co-Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the SDNY. The email is addressed to Audrey Strauss and contains attachments regarding a revised status memo on Jeffrey Epstein intended for the ODAG (Office of the Deputy Attorney General).
EFTA00026563.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 16, 2019. It discusses a media inquiry from CNN regarding an allegation that a specific individual (name redacted) visited the SDNY office in 2015 or 2016 to raise concerns about Jeffrey Epstein's Florida plea deal with a sex trafficking AUSA. The email notes that the reporter believes the issue was not raised to senior leadership at the time.
EFTA00018397.pdf
This document is an email dated July 8, 2019, sent from a redacted individual at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The email shares a link to a Washington Examiner article reporting that James Comey's daughter has been named to the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution team. The subject line 'pic' suggests there may have been an attachment or the link was intended to show a picture, though only the URL is visible in the body.
EFTA00016747.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 17, 2019, involving a Public Affairs officer from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The email discusses a 'NY Mag piece' and shares a link to an article about Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. The sender also attaches a PDF document titled '2019-07-16_JE_detention_submission_Redacted.pdf', referring to a legal filing made the previous night regarding Epstein's detention.
EFTA00016136.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY. The letter requests extensive discovery materials including the specific identities of 'dozens of minor girls' and 'employees' mentioned in the indictment, flight logs ('use of Mr. Epstein's planes'), massage schedules, and visitor logs. The defense also requests 'Brady material' (exculpatory evidence), specifically seeking evidence to support defenses that Epstein believed victims were over 18, that victims deceived him about their age, and that payments were gifts rather than for sex acts.
EFTA00014576.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, Michael Miller) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It supplements a previous discovery request, specifically demanding the preservation and production of documents from the lead prosecutor (name redacted) who investigated Epstein in 2006-2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The request focuses on communications regarding investigations in New York in 2008, a March 2008 trip to New York by said prosecutor, and communications with victim witnesses regarding their rights.
EFTA00011180.pdf
This document is a formal statement by forensic accountant Preston M. Faro, owner of Preston M. Faro & Associates Inc. Faro was hired by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to independently verify a 'Financial Condition Report' prepared by Macalvins Accountants regarding the assets of Ghislaine Maxwell and her husband for the period 2015-2020. Faro details his extensive background in fraud investigation with the IRS and FBI before concluding that the Macalvins report is a complete and accurate summary of Maxwell's financial assets.
EFTA00011168.pdf
This document is a sworn statement by a forensic accountant and former IRS-CID Special Agent hired by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The expert was tasked with independently reviewing a Financial Condition Report prepared by Macalvins Accountants regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's assets for the period of 2015-2020. The expert concludes that the report accurately summarizes the assets held by Maxwell, her husband, and related trusts.
DOJ-OGR-00001734.jpg
This document is page 3 of a government filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 21, 2020. The government argues against modifying a protective order, asserting that the defendant should not be allowed to use discovery materials from this criminal case in her parallel civil cases. The filing highlights that the grand jury investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators is active and ongoing, and that disseminating these materials could compromise witness privacy and the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00001704.jpg
This legal document is a court order issued by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 30, 2020. The order resolves a dispute in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN by adopting the Government's proposed protective order and rejecting the Defense's request for further restrictions on discovery materials as unwarranted and unprecedented.
DOJ-OGR-00001641.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 7 of 7) of a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, with copies sent to prosecutors at the SDNY (Moe, Rossmiller, Comey) and other defense counsel (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger).
DOJ-OGR-00020928.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) for legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on March 9, 2022. The prospective juror denies having any association with the NYPD and states they have no opinion of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, or former Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss that would impede their ability to be a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020812.jpg
This document is a page from a court order rejecting Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) protects her from prosecution in the Southern District of New York. Citing the Second Circuit precedent *United States v. Annabi*, the court maintains that plea agreements generally only bind the specific district where they are entered. The court dismisses Maxwell's renewed motion and supplemental authority, affirming that the SDNY is not bound by the agreement made in another district.
DOJ-OGR-00002539.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the timeline of events following the Miami Herald's 2018 reporting and Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 death. It covers the dismissal of the indictment against Epstein due to his suicide, the ongoing CVRA litigation by victims (specifically Jane Doe 1) in the 11th Circuit regarding the government's failure to confer with victims before the NPA, and the initiation of the OPR investigation requested by Senator Ben Sasse.
DOJ-OGR-00022167.jpg
This document is an official statement summarizing the FBI's conclusion that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019. This finding is supported by video evidence showing no one entered his cell tier overnight and is consistent with previous findings from the NYC Chief Medical Examiner, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the DOJ's Inspector General. The statement also provides links to the raw and enhanced video footage.
DOJ-OGR-00022128.jpg
This document is the first page of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Michael Thomas, filed on May 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Thomas was indicted in November 2019 for conspiracy to defraud the US and making false records (charges related to his role as a prison guard the night Jeffrey Epstein died, though Epstein is not named on this page). The agreement outlines conditions for a six-month deferred prosecution, including obeying laws, associating only with law-abiding persons, maintaining employment, and travel restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00021181.jpg
This legal document outlines the events following Jeffrey Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, including the dismissal of his federal indictment in New York and the progression of a Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) lawsuit in Florida. It details a specific victim's appeal and the government's arguments. The document also describes the initiation of an investigation by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) into potential prosecutorial misconduct, prompted by a Miami Herald report and a formal request from Senator Ben Sasse.
DOJ-OGR-00019551.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a letter from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020, arguing against modifying a protective order. The Government asserts that the defendant (implied Ghislaine Maxwell) should not be allowed to use materials from criminal discovery in her civil cases, citing witness privacy and an active, ongoing grand jury investigation into co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein. The text emphasizes that defense counsel represents the defendant in both criminal and civil matters and warns against 'cherry-picking' confidential materials to defend against abuse accusations.
DOJ-OGR-00019548.jpg
This is a court order issued by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 30, 2020. The order grants the Government's proposed protective order concerning discovery materials, finding the Defense's arguments against the restrictions to be unwarranted and unprecedented. The ruling resolves docket item number 29 in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019336.jpg
This document is page 3 of a letter from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (referenced as 'the defendant'). The Government argues against modifying a protective order, stating that the defendant should not be allowed to use materials from criminal discovery in her various civil cases, as this would violate witness privacy and jeopardize an 'active' ongoing grand jury investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators. The text highlights that the same defense counsel represents the defendant in both civil and criminal matters, raising concerns about the inappropriate use of confidential discovery materials to defend against abuse accusations by civil plaintiffs.
DOJ-OGR-00010540.jpg
This legal document, filed by the U.S. Government on June 22, 2022, provides background on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed co-conspirator (the defendant). It outlines the timeline of the investigation, starting in November 2018, and details the indictments against Epstein and the defendant, which involved the abuse of several victims identified as Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, and Carolyn. The document asserts that the investigation was prompted by investigative journalism and not by civil litigants.
DOJ-OGR-00009083.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The juror denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. This section of the questionnaire is designed to identify potential conflicts of interest or bias among prospective jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00010450.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case) summarizing the timeline of the government's case against Jeffrey Epstein. It details the resurrection of the case by the SDNY following the lenient 2007 Florida plea deal, his arrest on July 6, 2019, and the aftermath of his death in BOP custody. The text criticizes the government's failure to keep Epstein alive for trial and mentions the 'urgency' to repair the DOJ's reputation, ending with a mention of four women named as co-conspirators.
DOJ-OGR-00009774.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, for case 20-cr-00330-ABN. The juror responds to a series of questions about their personal relationships with key case participants. The juror explicitly denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity