This document collection from September 19-20, 2005, includes correspondence regarding real estate in Cambridge, MA, and NYC, as well as a significant fax from JPMorgan Chase advising Epstein that a 'deal is not going to work' and to move his money. It also contains various handwritten notes on Epstein and Maxwell stationery referencing flight logistics ('Jet A', 'Lauderdale'), a 'Clinton Guest List', 'gun holsters', and scheduling for 'Sandy Berger'. The documents establish Epstein's presence in Palm Beach at the time while managing affairs in Boston and New York.
This document appears to be a personal narrative or memoir excerpt, likely by Alan Dershowitz (based on the son's name 'Elon' and the Harvard Square setting), dated April 2, 2012. The text describes an incident where the narrator's 10-year-old son was assaulted and threatened by thugs in Harvard Square. The narrator admits to intimidating the thugs by falsely implying he had a personal connection to a notorious hit man he was consulting for legally, an act he questions as a potential 'crime' but justifies as parental protection.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of Harvard and First Amendment advocacy found in House Oversight docs) discussing historical clashes between civil libertarians and feminists regarding pornography. The narrator details events at Harvard University's Quincy House surrounding the screening of the film 'Deep Throat,' including student votes, administrative responses, violent incidents (shootings/firebombing), and organized protests which the narrator supported despite defending the legal right to show the material.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the 'pornocrat lawyer' and 'Harvard Square deli' context) included in House Oversight materials. It discusses the controversy surrounding the film *Deep Throat*, contrasting Gloria Steinem's view of Linda Lovelace as a victim with actor Harry Reems' claim that Lovelace was a willing participant. The text details the author's conversation with Reems and the subsequent feminist backlash and boycotts against the author for representing industry figures.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book written by Alan Dershowitz, stamped with a House Oversight production number. It recounts a legal argument Dershowitz made before Judge Julian and Judge Aldrich regarding First Amendment protections for films, specifically involving Grove Press and the distinction between enclosed theaters and public displays of obscenity. The text includes both transcript-style dialogue and first-person narrative commentary by Dershowitz.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity