| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1942-01-01 | N/A | First of the Macy conferences regarding control of complex systems. | Unknown | View |
This document appears to be a page from a book or interview transcript (page 184) included in House Oversight documents. It features a first-person narrative, likely by Stephen Wolfram, discussing the history of Artificial Intelligence, neural networks, and the development of his system, Wolfram|Alpha. The text reviews the history of AI from the perceptron to expert systems and details the narrator's shift in thinking regarding computational knowledge systems between 2002 and 2003. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
This document is page 119 of a larger text, marked as a House Oversight exhibit. It contains a scientific or philosophical essay discussing the convergence of computation and physical fabrication, referencing Von Neumann, Turing, and Gordon Moore. The text explores the implications of self-reproducing automata, digital fabrication, and the future of AI, suggesting a merging of artificial and natural intelligence.
The text explores the parallels between biological evolution, specifically Hox genes, and artificial intelligence, arguing that AI currently suffers from a "mind-body problem" due to its lack of physical form. It advocates for "digital materials"—modular, programmable physical components analogous to amino acids or Lego bricks—to bridge the gap between computation and fabrication. The author references pioneers like von Neumann, Shannon, and Turing to contextualize the convergence of digital information and physical construction.
This document appears to be page 54 of a philosophical or technical essay regarding the ethics of artificial intelligence, data privacy, and surveillance capitalism. The text criticizes 'West Coast companies' for monetizing user data and inferences without consent and contrasts profit-driven exploitation with government suppression of dissent. It concludes by stating that solving these issues requires engineering, legislation, and moral leadership. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document page discusses the vulnerabilities inherent in modern software, specifically explaining "buffer overrun" exploits and comparing computer viruses to biological ones. It highlights the widespread reliance on vulnerable computer systems for critical infrastructure and daily life, while also illustrating how modern web browsing has shifted from simple data retrieval to a model involving continuous user tracking and data collection.
This document appears to be page 12 of a manuscript or book draft detailing the history of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence. It discusses the shift from Norbert Wiener's 1st order Cybernetics to 2nd order Cybernetics championed by Heinz von Foerster and the Macy conferences. The narrator describes receiving an invitation to the 1973 AUM Conference in Big Sur, organized by John Lilly and Alan Watts, specifically to see keynote speaker Richard Feynman.
This page, stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015914), appears to be an excerpt from a book or essay titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. It features an image of a MakerBot 3D printer and text discussing the history of computer architecture (von Neumann vs. Harvard), the roles of companies like Intel and ARM, and the basic definition of software programs. The text cuts off mid-sentence at the bottom of the page.
This document appears to be page 184 of a manuscript or essay, likely written by Stephen Wolfram. It details the history of Artificial Intelligence, citing the stagnation caused by Minsky and Papert's work on perceptrons, the rise and fall of expert systems, and the narrator's personal journey in developing Wolfram|Alpha between 2002 and 2003 based on computational knowledge rather than brain simulation. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a production of documents, likely related to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's connections with scientists.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity