A June 2021 email chain among USANYS staff discussing a security concern raised by EOUSA regarding a data transfer. EOUSA flagged documents stamped 'CONFIDENTIAL' related to Epstein as a potential 'classified spill' because they were unredacted. USANYS staff clarified that the stamp referred to a protective order in the litigation, not national security classification, and noted the production involved 5GB of non-testifying witness material (Jencks Act material).
This legal document details how prosecutor Acosta, responding to the defense's desire for a 'fresh face', engaged the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) to review the evidence in the Epstein case. CEOS attorney VillafaƱa traveled to Florida, interviewed victims, and reported back to Acosta and Sloman on the victims' severe trauma and their desire for significant jail time for Epstein rather than restitution. The document also notes the CEOS Trial Attorney's assessment to OPR that the victim witnesses presented numerous challenges for a potential prosecution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity